Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of working casts for crown and bridge restorations made from twin mix putty/wash silicone elastomeric impression materials using different types of stock tray.
Design: A master cast was made from ivorine teeth in a mandibular model. Three teeth were prepared for full crown restorations to simulate a single unit and a three unit bridge. Impressions were taken using four different types of impression tray and two different viscosities of silicone putty, together with a wash. Full metal crowns were constructed and seated on duplicate master casts and measurements made of the marginal discrepancies.
Setting: The work was carried out in a dental technology laboratory in a university department of restorative dentistry in 1995/1996.
Results: Metal and rigid plastic impression trays showed the least discrepancy (about 50 microns), the latter slightly greater with the normal putty than the soft one. Impressions taken with flexible plastic trays produced considerable discrepancy with both putties, approximately 210 microns and 180 microns respectively.
Conclusions: Metal and rigid plastic stock trays give greater accuracy in the putty/wash silicone twin mix impression technique compared with flexible plastic ones for crown and bridge work. Those using the latter should be aware of their shortcoming in this respect
About this article
Cite this article
Carrotte, P., Johnson, A. & Winstanley, R. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review. Br Dent J 185, 580–585 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809870
Disposable plastic trays and their effect on polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impression accuracy—an in vitro study
Clinical Oral Investigations (2021)
Faculty Dental Journal (2020)
Multifunctional Templates for Minimized Osteotomy, Implantation, and Palatal Distraction with a Mini-Screw-Assisted Expander in Schizodontism and Maxillary Deficit
Case Reports in Dentistry (2020)
Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study
Dental Materials (2020)
Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen
BMC Oral Health (2020)