Abstract
Four matched pairs of geographically and socially contrasting areas of Britain were randomly allocated within pairs to either a capitation or fee-for-service payment system for the dental care of children in a 3-year clinical trial. Measurements were made on the dental health of randomly selected 5-6 and 14-15-year-old patients and the views of their parents elicited. Patterns of treatment were also gained from the clinical records of randomly selected patients. In addition, the views of the dentists taking part, of the profession's representatives, and of the administrators of the systems were obtained. No evidence of systematic neglect could be found among the children treated under capitation, but they had fewer fillings, more untreated diseased teeth and similar disease levels to their counterparts treated under fee-for-service. Dentists in capitation carried out fewer fillings, fewer extractions, took fewer radiographs and saw their patients less frequently than their fee-for-service colleagues
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holloway, P., Lennon, M., Mellor, A. et al. The capitation study. 1. Does capitation encourage 'supervised neglect'?. Br Dent J 168, 119–121 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807099
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807099
This article is cited by
-
Contract reform - the BDA's view
British Dental Journal (2022)
-
Twelve years with a capitation payment system in Swedish dental care: longitudinal development of oral health
BMC Oral Health (2021)
-
Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland
BMC Health Services Research (2017)
-
Incentives and remuneration systems in dental services
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics (2009)
-
Randomized pilot study to disseminate caries-control services in dentist offices
BMC Oral Health (2006)