Advances in the power output of light emitting diodes (LEDS) have allowed a LED light curing unit (LCU) with an 8 mm diameter light guide tip to achieve a similar depth of cure in a camphorquinone photoinitiated composite, as a halogen LCU.
LEDs have long lifetimes and a more consistent output than halogen bulbs. The power density (irradiance) of an LED LCU does not have to be as high as a conventional halogen LCU to achieve the same depth of cure.
Blue LEDs can be used as photodetectors and may be of future use in dental radiometers.
When assessing the output from an LCU it is not only important to know the spectrum and irradiance, but also whether the emission is pulsed or continuous.
Objective To test the hypothesis that a prototype LED light curing unit, (LCU), a commercial LED LCU and a halogen LCU achieve similar cure depths, using two shades of a camphorquinone photoinitiated dental composite. To measure the LCUs' outputs and the frequency of the LED LCU's pulsed light, using a blue LED array as a photodetector.
Design Cure depth and light output characterisation to compare the LCUs.
Setting An in vitro laboratory study conducted in the UK.
Materials and Methods The LCUs cured A2 and A4 composite shades. A penetrometer measured the depth of cure. Analysis was by one-way ANOVA, two-way univariate ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test with a 95% confidence interval. A power meter and spectrograph characterised the LCUs' emissions. A blue LED array measured the pulsed light frequency from an LED LCU.
Results Statistically significant different LCU irradiances (119 mW/cm2 to 851 mW/cm2) and cure depths (3.90 mm SD ± 0.08 to 6.68 mm SD ± 0.07) were achieved. Composite shade affected cure depth. A blue LED array detected pulsed light at 12 Hz from the commercial LED LCU.
Conclusions The prototype LED LCU achieved a greater or equal depth of cure when compared with the commercial LCUs. LEDs may have a potential in dentistry for light detection as well as emission.
Curing of dental composites with blue light was introduced in the 1970s.1 A typical dental light curing unit (LCU) normally combines a tungsten filament halogen bulb, a reflector and a filter, so that blue light in the 410 nm–500 nm region of the visible spectrum is produced. This is effectively absorbed by the camphorquinone (CQ) photoinitiator2,3,4 present in many light cured composites. This light causes CQ excitation, which in combination with an amine, produces free radicals to polymerise the resin monomers.5 Halogen LCU recommended curing times generally vary between 20 s and 60 s for a 2 mm increment of composite.
Halogen lamps found in most LCUs have an effective lifetime of approximately 50 hours.6 The degradation of light output over time results in a reduction of the LCU's composite curing effectiveness.7 Several studies8,9,10 have shown that many halogen LCUs in clinical use do not produce their optimum output due to a lack of maintenance. Monitoring and maintenance of LCUs is thus extremely important. The lower effective limit of irradiance for halogen LCUs used in dental practice has been suggested to be 300 mW/cm2.11,12
Other curing methods such as laser13 and xenon arc14 sources have been used to polymerise dental composites with the claimed advantage of reduced curing times. These devices are complex and costly compared with halogen LCUs, and lasers require elaborate precautions.
Blue electroluminescence from a LED formed by a silicon carbide crystal was discovered by H. J. Round in 1907.15 The invention of a synthetic red LED in 196216 provided a new type of light source that was robust, efficient and suitable for portable battery applications. It was almost 30 years later that a bright blue LED was realised,17 and in 1995, blue LEDs producing 4.8 mW were reported.18 More recently ultra violet LEDs with a power output of 38 mW have been produced.19 LEDs require no filters because of their relatively narrow emission spectra and can achieve lifetimes of over 100,000 hours with relatively little degradation.20 These advantages of LEDs showed promise and blue LEDs were proposed for curing dental composites.21,22
Several studies using LEDs for curing have been reported.23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32 When LED and halogen light sources of the same irradiance are used, the LEDs can achieve a greater cure depth when assessed by Knoop hardness and Fourier transform infra red (FTIR) spectroscopy degree of conversion analysis.24 LED sources with a lower irradiance than the halogen source have also achieved a greater depth of cure27 and can achieve a similar compressive strength.28 Stahl et al.29 demonstrated that the ISO404933 standard for flexural strength properties for many composites was achievable with an LED LCU having a lower irradiance than a commercial halogen LCU.
Light guides with a tip of 8 mm in diameter are often used clinically, although 6 mm diameter tips were used in some earlier work.25,27,28,29 To maintain the same irradiance in an 8 mm as a 6 mm diameter light guide requires 40% more optical power. We aimed to construct a more powerful LED LCU so that all LCUs tested had similar 8 mm diameter light guide tips commonly used clinically. Another objective was to include in the study the first commercially available LED LCU that we could acquire in the UK.
Materials and methods
The halogen LCU used was a Coltolux 4 model (Coltene/Whaledent Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey, USA) with a curved, parallel, fused glass fibre light guide. The commercial LED LCU was a LuxOMax (Akeda Dental, Lystrup, Denmark) with a curved, tapered, fused glass fibre light guide. The prototype LED LCU (LED63) was built by the first author and had a straight, tapered acrylic light guide. The LCU specifications are shown in Table 1.
The different layouts of the LED arrays of the LuxOMax and prototype LED LCUs are shown in Figure 1. The LuxOMax array contained seven unmodified 5 mm diameter blue LEDs of unknown origin, while the LED63 was constructed from 63 custom shaped 3 mm diameter blue LEDs (Nichia Chemical Industries Ltd., Anan, Japan). The light from the LED63 LCU was used in continuous wave mode and concentrated using a polymer optical taper. The amount of light transmitted depends on many factors, including the ratio of the areas of the taper's ends and its length.34 No fan cooling was necessary for the LED LCU owing to efficient heat dissipation from the LEDs by copper heat sinks. The LuxOMax LED LCU was used in its highest energy mode. This allowed 39 s of full power and 1 s of reduced softstart power.
The power output for all LCUs was measured on a Molectron PM3 thermopile sensor connected to a Molectron 500D power meter (Molectron Detector Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA). The light guides were brought in perpendicular contact with the detector when recording the measurements. The spectra of the LCUs were measured using a MS127i imaging spectrograph with an Instaspec IV CCD array detector (LOT Oriel, Leatherhead, UK).
During the LuxOMax testing it was noticed that the softstart mode light appeared to flicker, indicating it may be pulsed. To investigate this observation, a detector was constructed with 27 custom shaped 3 mm diameter blue LEDs connected in parallel. The detector array was a similar design to the inner two rings of the LED63 (Figure 1). This array was directly connected to a Tektronix Model 465 100 MHz oscilloscope (Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Oregon, USA). It has been suggested previously to use LEDs as wavelength sensitive detectors.35 The peak wavelength of an LED used as a detector is shorter than the peak emission, and this can be between 20 nm and 60 nm.35,36
Two shades of a typical CQ photoinitiated hybrid composite were used, Spectrum TPH A2 and A4, (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). Ten samples for each composite shade and LCU combination were cured for 40 s in a stainless steel mould with a diameter of 4 mm and depth of 8 mm. The LED63 was used in two different modes, one using an average driving current of 40 mA per LED, and the other 45 mA per LED respectively. Thus depth of cure was measured for a total of 80 specimens using a penetrometer as described elsewhere.25,37
A two-way univariate ANOVA was performed with the factors LCU and shade to determine the influence of the different factors on the depth of cure. In addition, a one-way ANOVA was applied on the depth of cure data for the shades A2 and A4 to determine the effect of the different LCUs on the depth of cure.
A Fisher's LSD test was used to discriminate between the means and to determine homogenous groups of the depth of cure. All statistical analyses were performed with the software Statgraphics Plus (Version 5.0) using a confidence interval of 95%.
Results and statistical analysis
The spectra for both the halogen and LED LCUs are displayed in Figure 2. The area under each plot represents the optical power of the LCUs. The power from the LED63 peaks at 457 nm and the LuxOMax LCU at 466 nm and is concentrated over a much narrower wavelength band than the halogen LCU.
Details of the cure depths and LCU outputs are shown in Table 2. The optical power outputs ranged between 428 mW for the halogen LCU and 60 mW for the LuxOMax. The optical power output of the LED63 LCU was 310 mW at 40 mA per LED and increased to 335 mW at 45 mA per LED. This represented an 8% rise for optical power (25 mW) and irradiance (50 mW/cm2). The corresponding electrical power consumption increase was from 10.6 W to 12.0 W representing an increase of 12% (1.4 W).
A two-way ANOVA showed that both LCU (p<0.001) and shade (p<0.001) had a statistically significant effect on the depth of cure. A Fisher's LSD test was used to identify statistically homogeneous groups within the LCUs. For both shades the LuxOMax achieved the statistically significant lowest depth of cure. The Coltolux 4 and LED63 produced statistically significantly different depths of cure for the shade A4. There was, however, no statistically significant difference between the Coltolux 4 and LED63 for the shade A2.
The mean increase in depth of cure with LED63 driven at 45 mA per LED compared with 40 mA per LED was only 1.5% (0.1 mm) for the light A2 shade and 1% (0.05 mm) for the darker A4 shade composite.
Measurement of the softstart phase of the LuxOMax LED LCU by the blue LED array connected directly to an oscilloscope resulted in a pulsed waveform being detected. The overall pulse cycle was 82 ms with a pulse width of 30 ms and an off-time of 52 ms. This gives a mark:space ratio of approximately 1:1.7 and a frequency of 12 Hz. Measurement of the LuxOMax unit at full power showed this to be a continuous wave output.
The light output from all LCUs differs in several respects. Previous work has shown that an LED LCU with a lower irradiance than a halogen LCU can achieve a greater depth of cure.27 This is again confirmed here: LED63 had only 78% of the irradiance of the halogen LCU, yet exceeded the depth of cure. This has been explained previously by the effectiveness of different spectral outputs.2,3,4,29 This lower output is also advantageous clinically, as less heat is being transmitted to the tooth and adjacent tissues. The human eye can only detect individual light pulses spaced at a minimum of 20 ms38 and this equates to a maximum of almost 50 Hz with brief pulses. The results from the blue LED array and oscilloscope would appear to explain why the softstart mode of the LuxOMax appeared to flicker. Pulsing of a light curing source has been shown to have a different effect on curing,39 so it is important to state whether the source is continuous wave or pulsed. This also confirmed that LEDs can act as detectors. It is possible that they may form the basis of a new type of dental radiometer in the future.
The composites used in this study were of differing shades but similar chemistry. The LED LCUs' emission spectra were well matched to the absorption spectrum of the CQ photoinitiator present in the composite. In composites where initiators are present that absorb outside the relatively narrow emission of the LED LCUs an LED curing may be less effective. In a previous study,29 this was one explanation why the composite Solitaire™ (Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) which contains photoinitiators outside the LED emission spectrum,14 achieved relatively low flexural strengths compared with other materials tested. Xenon arc sources also have a narrow bandwidth and the suitability of xenon arc curing has been found to depend on the photoinitiators used in the composite.14
The results showed that an LED LCU with an 8 mm diameter light guide tip is capable of a statistically significantly greater depth of cure for a CQ initiated composite than a halogen LCU with a similar light guide tip diameter. This is an improvement on some previous work,27,28 as a comparable depth of cure has been achieved between an LED LCU with a light guide tip with a 40% greater area. Different interchangeable LED arrays may become available to match different composites' photoinitiators, in the same way as different bandwidth filters are supplied with some xenon arc LCUs. Mixing LEDs of different wavelengths within the same array is another possible method of covering more than one photoinitiator. Another possibility is that composite manufacturers standardise, using just one photoinitiator. Future research will also aim towards comparisons of LED LCUs that have a 60° bend in the light guide so that access to all areas of the oral cavity is possible. Significant losses of transmission occur when large diameter light guides are bent. This means even more power from an LED array will be required, unless the LEDs are placed at the end of the light guide.
Although LED LCUs are capable of curing a similar depth of composite as a commercial halogen LCU, not all LED LCUs have the same performance, as shown in the current study. DeWald and Ferracane40 showed that an adequate degree of polymerisation approximates to 50% of the depth of cure assessed by mechanical scraping to locate the interface between the 'soft and hard' parts of the specimen. A penetrometer attempts to record this position more objectively by exerting a reproducible consistent force. Using these criteria, it can be estimated that the commercial LED LCU reaches just above an adequate degree of polymerisation for a 2 mm increment of the lighter A2 shade composite. With the darker A4 shade, this 2 mm level is not reached. These results were for a composite that does not contain photoinitiators that absorb outside the emission spectra of the LEDs. Even lower levels of polymerisation may be expected if this were the case.14 Clinically, it is preferable to have a greater safety margin to ensure adequate polymerisation, and LCUs should have possibly twice the minimum irradiance found to be required in the laboratory. Dentists should remember the guideline that doubling the irradiance of an LCU only approximates to a 20% increase in the depth of adequate polymerisation.41 The results here should help dentists to weigh the different factors when choosing the most appropriate LCU for their application. Blue LED technology continues to improve and appears to have a useful future role in dentistry.
Bassiouny MA, Grant AA A visible light-cured composite restorative. Br Dent J 1978; 145: 327–330.
Cook WD Spectral distribution of dental photopolymerization sources. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1436–1438.
Yearn JA Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 1985; 35: 218–225.
Nomoto R Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. Dent. Mater J 1997; 16: 60–73.
Taira M, Urabe H, Hirose T, Wakasa K, Yamaki M Analysis of photo-initiators in visible-light-cured dental composite resins. J Dent Res 1987; 67: 24–28.
Cayless MA, Marsden AM Tungsten halogen lamps. In, Lamps and Lighting. 3rd ed pp169–182 London: Edward Arnold Ltd 1983.
Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 25: 992–996.
Martin FE A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998; 26: 239–243.
Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, Kondo M, Onose H, Moore BK Evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 50–54.
Mitton BA, Wilson NH F The use and maintenance of visible light activating units in general practice. Br Dent J 2001; 191: 82–86.
Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Curtis Jr JW Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1280–1286.
Shortall A, Harrington E Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of visible light activation units. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 383–387.
Cobb DS, Vargas MA, Rundle T Physical properties of composites cured with conventional light or argon laser. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 199–202.
Hofmann N, Hugo B, Schubert K, Klaiber B Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2000; 4: 140–147.
Round HJ A note on carborundum. Elect World 1907; 19: 309.
Holonyak Jr N, Bevacqua SF Coherent (visible) light emission from Ga(As1-xPx) junctions. App Phys Lett 1962; 1: 82.
Nakamura S, Mukai T, Senoh M High-Power GaN P-N Junction blue-light-emitting diodes. Jpn J Appl Phys Lett 1991; 30: L1998–L2001.
Nakamura S, Senoh M, Iwasa N, Nagahama S High-power InGaN single-quantum-well-structure blue and violet light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 1995; 67: 1868–1870.
Tadatomo K, Okagawa H, Ohuchi Y, Tsunekawa T, Imada Y, Kato M, Taguchi T High output power InGaN ultraviolet light-emitting diodes fabricated on patterned substrates using metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. Jpn J Appl Phys 2001; 40: L583–L585.
Haitz RH, Craford MG, Weissman RH Light emitting diodes. In Bass M. (ed) Handbook of Optics 2nd ed pp12.1–12.39 McGraw Hill Inc 1995.
Mills RW Blue light emitting diodes - an alternative method of light curing? Br Dent J 1995; 178: 169 Letter.
Kennedy J Portable LED photocuring device. US Patent 5420768 30 May 1995.
Fujibayashi K, Ishimaru K, Kohno A A study on light activation units using blue light-emitting diodes. J Jpn Dent Pres Acad 1996; 39: 180–188.
Fujibayashi K, Ishimaru K, Takahashi N, Kohno A Newly developed curing unit using blue light-emitting diodes. Dent Jpn 1998; 34: 49–53.
Mills RW, Jandt KD LEOS IEEE Newsletter. 1998; 12: 9–10.
Whitters CJ, Girkin JM, Carey JJ Curing of dental composites by use of InGaN light-emitting diodes. Optics Letters 1999; 24: 67–68.
Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 388–391.
Jandt KD, Mills RW, Blackwell GB, Ashworth SH Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Dent Mater 2000; 16: 41–47.
Stahl F, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH, Mills RW Light emitting diode (LED) polymerisation of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerisation potential. Biomat 2000; 21: 1379–1385.
Powell GL, Blankenau RJ, Boutoussov D Investigation of blue LEDs for polymerization of dental composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79 Abs 2903.
Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G, Ristic M Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehab 2001; 28: 586–591.
Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhaes DV, Bagnato VS Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 309–315.
ISO 4049:1988 British Standard Specification for Resin based dental filling materials (Class B).
Li Y, Lit JW Y Transmission properties of a multimode optical-fiber taper. J Opt Soc Am A 1985; 2: 462–468.
Miyazaki E, Itami S, Araki T Using a light-emitting diode as a high-speed, wavelength selective photodetector. Rev Sci Inst 1998; 69: 3751–3754.
Holland K LED doubles as emitter and detector. EDN 2001; 18: 108.
Harrington E, Wilson HJ Depth of cure of radiation-activated materials. Effect of mould material and cavity size. J Dent 1993; 21: 305–311.
Marston RM In, Optoelectronics Circuits Manual. 2nd ed p36 Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann 1999.
Meniga A, Tarle Z, Ristic M, Sutalo J, Pichler G Pulsed blue laser curing of hybrid composite resins. Biomat 1997; 18: 1349–1354.
DeWald JP, Ferracane JL A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of lightactivated composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 727–730.
Nomoto R, Uchida K, Hirasawa T Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater J 1994; 13: 198–205.
The authors are grateful to Dr Gordon Blackwell (Dentsply DeTrey) for providing the Spectrum composite, Mr. Paul Coughlan (CD Solutions, UK) for supplying the LuxOMax LCU, Mr Frederik Claeyssens, Mr James Petheridge and Mr James Smith (School of Chemistry, University of Bristol) for assistance with capturing the spectra.
About this article
Cite this article
Mills, R., Uhl, A. & Jandt, K. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 193, 459–463 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801597
This article is cited by
Clinical long-term success of contemporary nano-filled resin composites in class I and II restorations cured by LED or halogen light
Clinical Oral Investigations (2018)
Diode-pumped solid-state laser for bonding orthodontic brackets: effect of light intensity and light-curing time
Lasers in Medical Science (2011)
Temperature rise and degree of photopolymerization conversion of nanocomposites and conventional dental composites
Clinical Oral Investigations (2009)
Evaluation of the curing depth of two translucent composite materials using a halogen and two LED curing units
Clinical Oral Investigations (2008)