Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement

Instruction for authors submitting systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials:1

  • You must use the headings, subheadings and guidance of the checklist in Table 1 to structure your manuscript.

  • Please also submit a copy of the completed checklist with your manuscript, indicating whether each item was reported and the page number where it can be located.

  • Your manuscript must include a chart showing the flow of studies through the review as illustrated in Figure 1.

    Figure 1
    figure 1

    Progress through the stages of a systematic review of RCTs

Table 1 Table 1

References

  1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896–1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement. Br Dent J 192, 662 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801453

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801453

Search

Quick links