The expensive-tissue hypothesis proposes that brain enlargement during human evolution was offset by a reduced gut size. The finding that the typical trade-off in mammals is between brain size and fat reserves suggests otherwise. See Letter p.91
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Constraining the Likely Technological Niches of Late Middle Pleistocene Hominins with Homo naledi as Case Study
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Open Access 26 January 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Navarrete, A., van Schaik, C. P. & Isler, K. Nature 480, 91–93 (2011).
Aiello, L. C. & Wheeler, P. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 199–221 (1995).
Holloway, R. L., Broadfield, D. C. & Yuan, M. S. The Human Fossil Record Vol. 3 (Wiley, 2004).
Falk, D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2513–2518 (2007).
Carlson, K. J. et al. Science 333, 1402–1407 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Potts, R. Big brains explained. Nature 480, 43–44 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/480043a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/480043a
This article is cited by
-
Constraining the Likely Technological Niches of Late Middle Pleistocene Hominins with Homo naledi as Case Study
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (2021)
-
Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases
Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2018)