Main

Effect on plaque pH of fruit drinks with reduced carbohydrate content Toumba K. J. and Duggal M. S. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 626–629

Comment

It is quite clear that the BDA caused quite a controversy by accrediting 'Ribena Tooth-kind' — not least among the dental profession itself. Although reservations plainly exist about the whole concept of accreditation, surely we need to give scientifically-based helpful information to our patients. Suggesting to most parents of young children that water is the only drink that is safe as far as teeth are concerned may not be advice that is likely to be complied with. We have to approach dietary advice with common sense, particularly with regard to drinks. In the past it was dental caries that was the arch enemy of teeth, but although the prevalence has decreased very significantly in the previous 30 years, it still remains a huge problem, particularly in areas of deprivation.

However, the spectre of dental erosion is also one to be aware of. Erosion differs from caries in that it is the irreversible loss of tooth tissues by a chemical process and does not involve bacteria. Although longitudinal data on the prevalence of erosion are not available there have been several subjective reports suggesting that it is an increasing problem. The consumption of soft drinks has also increased dramatically in the past few years and still continues to escalate. This research project is therefore timely in assessing the acidogenic response in dental plaque after challenge with four drinks, two of which were newly formulated low carbohydrate Ribena blackcurrant drinks.

The participants in the study refrained from brushing their teeth for 48 hours and then, following a baseline reading of their plaque pH, they rinsed their mouths with randomly allocated test drinks for 30 seconds. Plaque samples were tested subsequently 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after rinsing. The plaque sampling method used is a recognised standard system but another approach would have been to use an indwelling pH electrode. This would have enabled the immediate pH drop following rinsing to be measured. It is highly likely that sampling at 5 minutes will not record the minimum pH1 but the authors have acknowledged this possibility in their discussion.

What is quite clear from this study is that a 10% sucrose drink is a serious problem. The mean plaque pH curve in figure 1 probably considerably underestimates this. There are quite a number of commercially available fruit-based soft drinks which will show similar trends. The two newly formulated low carbohydrate blackcurrant drinks and the apple and blackcurrant drink with no added sugar lead to significantly lower acid production in vivo.

The conclusion drawn that the new Ribena drinks with very low levels of carbohydrate had a low acidogenic potential and could not be considered to pose a significant risk for enamel demineralisation seems to be justified on the basis of this research. So, does that mean that they are safe and kind to teeth? To say that anything — apart from de-ionized sterile, water — is entirely safe is to underestimate the dental abuse some of our patients may commit. However, when trying to give advice to parents and young children that is likely to be acted on then suggesting a lower carbohydrate drink with lower acidogenic potential is undoubtedly helpful — and evidence-based!