Scientists think they can prove that free will is an illusion. Philosophers are urging them to think again.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Haynes, J.-D. Nature Neurosci. 11, 543-545 (2008).
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W. & Pearl, D. K. Brain 106, 623-642 (1983).
Bode, S. et al. PLoS ONE 6, e21612 (2011).
Fried, I., Mukamel, R. & Kreiman, G. Neuron 69, 548-562 (2011).
Vohs, K. D. & Schooler, J. W. Psychol. Sci. 19, 49-54 (2008).
Kerri Smith is editor of the Nature Podcast, and is based in London.
Related external links
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will. Nature 477, 23–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/477023a