Many researchers believe that quantitative metrics determine who gets hired and who gets promoted at their institutions. With an exclusive poll and interviews, Nature probes to what extent metrics are really used that way.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A comprehensive analysis of the history of DFT based on the bibliometric method RPYS
Journal of Cheminformatics Open Access 21 November 2019
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional information
See Editorial, page 845 , and metrics special at http://www.nature.com/metrics . Full results of the survey are available at http://go.nature.com/em7auj .
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbott, A., Cyranoski, D., Jones, N. et al. Metrics: Do metrics matter?. Nature 465, 860–862 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/465860a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/465860a
This article is cited by
-
Reasons and consequences of changes in Russian research assessment policies
Scientometrics (2022)
-
Developing a measure of innovation from research in higher education data
Scientometrics (2021)
-
Differing viewpoints around healthcare professions’ education research priorities: A Q-methodology approach
Advances in Health Sciences Education (2021)
-
Does newspapers coverage influence the citations count of scientific publications? An analysis of biomedical studies
Scientometrics (2020)
-
A comprehensive analysis of the history of DFT based on the bibliometric method RPYS
Journal of Cheminformatics (2019)