After years of wrangling over the chemical's toxicity, researchers are charting a new way forwards. Brendan Borrell investigates how the debate has reshaped environmental-health studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
196,21 € per year
only 3,85 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ho, S.-M. et al. Cancer Res. 66, 5624-5632 (2006).
Colborn, T., vom Saal, F. S. & Soto, A. M. Environ. Health Perspect. 101, 378-384 (1993).
Markey, C. M. et al. Biol. Reprod. 65, 1215-1223 (2001).
Suzuki, T. et al. Neuroscience 117, 639-644 (2003).
Myers, J. P. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 309-315 (2009)
Additional information
See Editorial, page 1103 .
Brendan Borrell is a freelance writer in New York City.
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
National Toxicology Program Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borrell, B. Toxicology: The big test for bisphenol A. Nature 464, 1122–1124 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/4641122a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4641122a
