Opinion | Published:

A route to more tractable expert advice

Nature volume 463, pages 294295 (21 January 2010) | Download Citation

There are mathematically advanced ways to weigh and pool scientific advice. They should be used more to quantify uncertainty and improve decision-making, says Willy Aspinall.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991).

  2. 2.

    & Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (eds Mosleh, A. & Bari, R. A.) 3, 2113–2118 (Springer, 1998).

  3. 3.

    , & Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 93, 745–756 (2008).

  4. 4.

    , , & Science 317, 1505–1506 (2007).

  5. 5.

    & Summary Report of the Expert Elicitation Workshop Results for Iatrogenic Prion Disease Risks in Canada (Univ. Ottawa, 2009); available at

  6. 6.

    et al. Not a Sure Thing: Making Regulatory Choices Under Uncertainty (Resouces for the Future, 2006); available at

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Willy Aspinall is Cabot professor of natural hazards and risk science at Bristol University, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. He provides expert elicitation services through his company Aspinall & Associates, Cleveland House, High Street, Tisbury SP3 6HF, UK.  Willy.Aspinall@Bristol.ac.uk

    • Willy Aspinall

Authors

  1. Search for Willy Aspinall in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/463294a

See Editorial, page 269.

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing