Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

GM crops: Battlefield

Papers suggesting that biotech crops might harm the environment attract a hail of abuse from other scientists. Emily Waltz asks if the critics fight fair.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Rosi-Marshall, E. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16204-16208 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schubert, D. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 969 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Losey, J. E., Rayor, L. S. & Carter, M. E. Nature 399, 214 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scriber, J. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12328-12330 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 


  6. Parrott, W. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, E10 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beachy, R. N., Federoff, N. V., Goldberg, R. B. & McHughen, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, E9 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Technical Review: Rosi-Marshall et al. 2007. PNAS 104: 16204-16208 (Monsanto, 2007); available at

  9. Miller, H. I., Morandini, P. & Ammann, K. Trends Biotechnol. 26, 122-125 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shantharam, S., Sullia, S. B. & Shivakumara Swamy, G. Curr. Sci. 95, 167-168 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Tank, J. L., Royer, T. V. & Whiles, M. R. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, E11 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pokelsek, J. D. et al. Presentation at the North American Benthiological Society Annual meeting, Columbia, South Carolina, 2007. Available at

  13. Quist, D. & Chapela, I. H. Nature 414, 541-543 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths, N. A. et al. Ecol. Appl. 19, 133-142 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beachy, R. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 1195-1196 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tabashnik, B. E., Gassmann, A. J., Crowder, D. W. & Carrière, Y. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 199-202 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moar, W. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 1072-1074 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. övei, G. L., Andow, D. A. & Arpaia, S. Environ. Entomol. 38, 293-306 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelton, A. M. et al. Transgenic Res. 18, 317-322 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Additional information

Emily Waltz is a freelance writer based in New York City. See also Correspondence Battlefield: hitting the supporters of biotechnology and Battlefield: useful debate needs caution and civility.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Nature Biotechnology: Report claims no yield advantage for Bt crops

Nature Biotechnology: Up in arms

Related external links

Emma Rosi-Marshall



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waltz, E. GM crops: Battlefield. Nature 461, 27–32 (2009).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing