It's simple to mop carbon dioxide out of the air, but it could cost a lot of money. In the second of three features on the carbon challenge, Nicola Jones talks with the scientists pursuing this strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
17 June 2009
The News Feature 'Sucking it up' ( Nature 458, 1094–1097; 2009) incorrectly stated that Global Thermostat is waiting for venture-capital funding to build a prototype for the capture of CO2 from the air. It already has sufficient funding in place. The News story 'Funding struggle for mercury monitoring' ( Nature 459, 620–621; 2009) erroneously located Changbai Mountain in Taiwan.
References
Pielke, R. A. Jr Environ. Sci. Pol. (in the press).
McKinsey & Company Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve (2009).
Keith, D. W., Ha-Duong, M. & Stolaroff, J. K. Climatic Change 74, 17–45 (2005)
Additional information
See also Editorial, page 1077, and www.nature.com/climatecrunch.
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
David Keith’s air capture work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, N. Climate crunch: Sucking it up. Nature 458, 1094–1097 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/4581094a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4581094a
This article is cited by
-
Geoengineering: One cool solution
Nature (2013)
-
Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration
Nature Geoscience (2010)
-
Energy for air capture
Nature Geoscience (2009)
