Correspondence | Published:

Switch to ecological engineering would aid independence

Nature volume 456, page 570 (04 December 2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Sir

In your News Feature 'Is China ready for GM rice?' (Nature 455, 850–852; 2008), you consider the merits of using genetically modified (GM) crops for pest control. But don't overlook the potential of ecological engineering, which can provide an important and undervalued approach to tackling agricultural problems.

Biological control in irrigated rice is a prime example of how increasing biodiversity can offer a key service to humans. Insect pests in rice are efficiently controlled by appropriate reduction of pesticide application together with landscape management (see, for example, M. J. Way and K. L. Heong Bull. Ent. Res. 84, 567–587; 1994). This strategy has led to almost complete abolition of insecticide application in places such as the research fields of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines.

It was the strikingly successful example of biodiversity and ecosystem services management by IRRI that persuaded us to recruit the institute into a large international research network (J. Settele et al. Nature 453, 850; 2008), with a view to developing sustainable land use on a global scale and refining ecological-engineering approaches.

Employing GM rice for pest control overlooks services available from natural resources that are not so dependent on big business and so do not undermine the independence of farmers and developing nations. Switching investment of resources from GM crops and pesticides to ecological engineering could be a more efficient long-term and low-cost strategy.

In such a well-studied crop as rice, ecological engineering could be implemented immediately. Research efforts should focus on developing sustainable management schemes for ecosystem services for other key crops, in China and worldwide.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 4, 06120 Halle, Germany  Josef.Settele@ufz.de

    • Josef Settele
  2. Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology and Earth and Biosphere Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

    • Jacobus Biesmeijer
  3. Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden

    • Riccardo Bommarco

Authors

  1. Search for Josef Settele in:

  2. Search for Jacobus Biesmeijer in:

  3. Search for Riccardo Bommarco in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/456570a

Contributions to this page may be submitted to correspondence@nature.com. Please see the Guide to Authors at http://tinyurl.com/373jsv. Published contributions are edited.

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing