Correspondence | Published:

What is nature, if it's more than just a place without people?

Nature volume 456, page 29 (06 November 2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Sir

Your Editorial 'Handle with care' (Nature 455, 263–264 2008) notes that many people define 'nature' as a place without people, and that this would suggest that nature is best protected by keeping humans far away. You question the value of this negative definition, arguing that “if nature is defined as a landscape uninfluenced by humankind, then there is no nature on the planet at all”.

This may be true. However, if we define nature as including humankind, the concept becomes so all-encompassing as to be practically useless.

As an ecologist, I consider humans to be embedded in nature rather than separate from it. This relationship does not disappear in an urban environment. For example, the food you eat, the paper you read and the energy you consume are all products of multiple interacting organisms and ecosystem services. But if we adopt this inclusive definition, it becomes impossible to identify anything on the planet that is not a part of 'nature'. In this case, an atom bomb becomes as 'natural' as an anthill.

A dilemma therefore arises. If nature is somewhere that humans are not, we lose sight of the fact that we are just another species intimately intertwined in the complex web of biological systems on this planet. However, if we place ourselves within a definition of nature, the definition then becomes essentially meaningless by extending to everything on Earth.

Your Editorial comments that “Nature doesn't have to end if we stop defining it by humankind's absence”. The problem is that once we no longer define nature by our absence, the concept has no end.

Is there a better definition of nature?

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities, University of Bergen, PO Box 7805, 5020 Bergen, Norway  fern.wickson@svt.uib.no

    • Fern Wickson

Authors

  1. Search for Fern Wickson in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/456029b

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing