Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

US election: Ghosts in the machine

Electronic voting machines were supposed to vanquish unreliable counts. They did not -- but David Lindley finds that other technologies present their own problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Additional information

See Editorial, page 1149 David Lindley is a freelance science writer based in Alexandria, Virginia.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

US election special

Related external links

Election Assistance Commission

Full text of HAVA

Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project

ACCURATE (NSF-funded voting project)

Verified Voting (advocating paper ballots)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindley, D. US election: Ghosts in the machine. Nature 455, 1171–1174 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/4551171a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4551171a

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing