Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Older scientists publish more papers

Age is no barrier to productivity.

There may be snow on the roof, but he's cranking out the papers. Credit: Punchstock

If the mind is the first to go, it doesn't seem to show up in the bibliography. A new study suggests that older scientists publish more than their younger counterparts.

A research team from the University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada, looked at the publication record of nearly 14,000 professors and found that those in their 50s and 60s published almost twice as many papers each year as those in their early 30s.

What's more, the papers are just as highly cited, according to the work, which appears on the arXiv preprint server (Y.Gingrasetal.;2008).

The survey, say its authors, is the strongest evidence yet that older scientists are at least as productive as their juniors, if not more productive. "We should not underestimate the older researcher," says team leader Yves Gingras, a historian of science.

Gingras became interested in the topic after reading that the average age for first grants from the US National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, rose from 34 in 1970 to nearly 42 in 2004. His team looked at publication data for 13,680 scientists and scholars in Quebec between 2000 and 2007, noted each researcher's age, the number of papers published and the citation record according to the Thomson Reuters citation index.

It’s better to keep researchers and let them work.

The findings held across both the sciences and the humanities. Unsurprisingly, the team found that productivity increased sharply throughout the late 20s and early 30s. But it continued to rise at a slower rate for researchers in their 40s and 50s. Active professors in their 60s continued to produce about three papers per year. The average impact factor of each paper fell during the rise in productivity, but turned upward again for papers published by older authors. Citations, meanwhile, remained stable, suggesting that older researchers were both more prolific and more highly cited than their juniors.

The survey is one of the largest of its kind, says Wolfgang Glänzel, a director at the Policy Research Centre for R&D Indicators at the Dutch-speaking Catholic University in Leuven, Belgium. He would like to know how many of the papers published by older authors are review articles, and what effect students had on their older co-authors' output. Both could be important factors in the apparent high productivity of senior scientists, he says.

"High impact is not the same as originality," adds Anthony van Raan, who studies science and technology policy at Leiden University in the Netherlands. Still, he says, the research makes a compelling case against mandatory retirement, which is commonplace throughout Europe. "It's better to keep [researchers] and let them work," he says. "They can be very productive."


Related links

Related links

Related external links

arXiv paper

The Canada Research Chair in the History and Sociology of Science

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumfiel, G. Older scientists publish more papers. Nature (2008).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing