Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Exhaust inspection

What do you see if you peer into the exhaust of a jet engine larger than our Solar System? Only astronomers with the largest radio telescopes can see the full picture — and definitive observations are beginning to filter through.

Cosmic jets — enormously energetic, highly directed beams of charged particles — can be ejected by stars as they form1, as they die2,3,4, and even, in certain instances, as they are reborn, rekindled by the accretion of surrounding gas5,6. The energy carried away by a jet can help to bring a dying massive star to explosion in a supernova, or disperse a less massive one as a planetary nebula. Jets provide some of the heating of the gas between stars, and can even disrupt the intergalactic medium in galaxy clusters.

Despite a profusion of hypotheses for how these cosmic power generators work, astronomers still don't have a clinching theory, largely because of a dearth of observations with which to compare models. New findings from Marscher et al. (page 966 of this issue)7 go a long way to redressing this imbalance. The authors report how, in unprecedented detail, they imaged a jet engine belching out a puff of exhaust, allowing real-time insight into how jets work.

Theories exploring the role of gas accretion in jet acceleration originated in the late 1970s and early 1980s8,9,10, and have more recently been extended to take account of features such as flows at close to the speed of light and the very hot temperatures of the jet plasma11. Many of the jet-forming objects are dense, accreting agglomerations of matter such as neutron stars or black holes, both of which originate from failed stars. But jets are also produced by objects such as fading 'white dwarf' stars, or even stars such as the Sun when they are first born. Understanding jet emission from one type of these objects, therefore, might lead to an understanding of many others.

The favoured picture that has emerged is of a mechanism similar to the operation of a fighter plane's jet engine, but confined within the lines of a strong magnetic field rather than a steel casing. Rotation of the magnetosphere around the central object creates a stiff, helical field that acts as both a turbine and a nozzle, expelling the exhaust flow and collimating it into a narrow beam (see Fig. 3 on page 968). Far from the object, this natural pinching action can overcollimate the beam, so that it starts to converge. The point of maximum convergence is known as the modified magnetohydrodynamic fast point; beyond that point, the jet can produce a strong 'fast-mode' shock wave that can distort or destroy the well-ordered structure of the magnetic nozzle. Other, less dramatic, 'slow-mode' shocks — pressure waves that travel parallel to the twisting field lines and do not disrupt them — can develop before the flow reaches the modified fast point.

The equations governing these processes are very complex, and several simplifying assumptions are needed to solve them. For that reason, the whole picture of magnetic jet acceleration just sketched is still a matter of debate. Marscher et al.7 are the first to test the picture observationally. Their results, at least partially, confirm the model.

The authors' test-bed was the notoriously unruly BL Lacertae, the archetype of a particularly extreme form of jet emitter known as a blazar. BL Lacertae is an active galaxy containing a central supermassive black hole, and produces a jet with a speed 99% that of light. The jet, to within 10°, is pointing directly at us, so that looking down into the jet nozzle allows Earth-bound observers to examine the engine's inner workings directly.

This particular jet emits enormous amounts of energy at radio frequencies, and is huge — about two light years across. So, despite its immense distance from us (about 900 million light years), its angular size seen from Earth is fairly large, at around 0.5 milliarcseconds (one arcsecond is 1/3,600th of a degree). Regular stellar jet engines in our Galaxy might be much closer, but they are diminutive by comparison, just nanoarcseconds in size. The jet from BL Lacertae was big enough for Marscher et al. to exploit a technique known as very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI), which uses radio telescopes scattered around Earth's surface to create essentially one big radio telescope. In this case, these were the ten telescopes of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory's Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), situated across the United States. Using this technique, the authors could make images of the jet with an angular resolution of about 0.1 milliarcseconds.

The VLBI technique, coupled with γ-ray, X-ray and optical-wavelength observations, allowed the authors to observe what happened as BL Lacertae sent a new pulse of plasma down its jet nozzle (see Fig. 1 on page 966). During the period of observation, the source twice sent out a flare of very-high-energy γ-rays. The first event looked very much like a slow-mode shock wave, tracing the plasma pulse as it travelled around one coil of the helical magnetic field. The field would thus seem to be well ordered up to that point, as predicted by theoretical models.

The second γ-ray flare coincided with a strong brightening of the radio 'core'; by this time, the pulse had probably left the magnetic nozzle and was passing through the strong fast-mode shock. Unfortunately, measurement limitations mean that we cannot be certain whether the magnetic field was helical or disordered in this core region during the second flare, although the strengthening and weakening of the radio polarization during and after the flare points to the second option. In that case, the fast-mode shock seems to have at least partially disrupted the helical field structure. Thus, despite the relative simplicity of the theoretical models, many of their predictions seem borne out by observations. This confirmation of the theoretical understanding of systems containing supermassive black holes increases the likelihood that jets of all sizes and types work in a similar way.

At present, jet acceleration from any cosmic object can be imaged only using the technique of VLBI at radio wavelengths. Observations at γ-ray wavelengths alone create the impression that flares may be produced within one-thousandth of a light year of a central black hole, but these latest observations7 indicate that they occur more than a light year away. Thus, when NASA's γ-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST, which is due to launch on 16 May, starts to deliver jet measurements, it will need VLBI co-observations to deliver a complete picture. Japan's new VSOP-2 satellite will increase the radio imaging resolution of jets such as that of BL Lacertae by at least a factor of three, but to complete much of its proposed work it will need instruments such as the VLBA to supply detailed interferometry images12. Unfortunately, VLBI instruments are currently facing a funding gap that could see them scaled back or closed. The results of Marscher et al.7 underscore how vital these instruments are to the understanding of jet acceleration throughout the Universe.


  1. 1

    Stapelfeldt, K. et al. IAU Symp. 182, 355–364 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Sahai, R. Astron. Soc. Pacif. Conf. Ser. 313, 141–147 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wang, L. et al. Astrophys. J. 550, 1030–1035 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Sari, R., Piran, T. & Halpern, J. P. Astrophys. J. 519, L17–L20 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Mirabel, I. F. C. R. Phys. 8, 7–15 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Bridle, A. H. & Perley, R. A. in High Energy Astrophysics (ed. Lamb, F.) 367–406 (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Marscher, A. P. et al. Nature 452, 966–969 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433–456 (1977).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 199, 883–903 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Meier, D. L., Koide, S. & Uchida, Y. Science 291, 84–92 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Vlahakis, N. & Königl, A. Astrophys. J. 596, 1080–1103 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Hagiwara, Y., Fomalont, E., Tsuboi, M. & Murata, Y. (eds) Approaching Micro-Arcsecond Resolution with VSOP-2: Astrophysics and Technology (Astron. Soc. Pacif., Seattle, WA, in the press).

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meier, D. Exhaust inspection. Nature 452, 945–946 (2008).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing