A recent spate of worrying clinical-trial data has researchers questioning drugs approved on the basis of how they affect biomarkers rather than clinical endpoints. Heidi Ledford looks at surrogate markers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Nissen, S. E. & Wolski, K. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 2457-2471 (2007).
Kastelein, J. J. P. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1431-1443 (2008).
Prentice, R. L. et al. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163, 589-599 (2006).
Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial Investigators N. Engl. J. Med. 321, 406-412 (1989).
Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II Investigators N. Engl. J. Med. 327, 227-233 (1992).
Temple, R. J. in Clinical Measurement in Drug Evaluation (eds Nimmo, W. S. & Tucker, G. T.) (Wiley, New York, 1995).
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Nature Insight: Obesity and Diabetes
Nature Insight: Cardiovascular Disease
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ledford, H. Drug markers questioned. Nature (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/452510a
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/452510a
This article is cited by
-
Off-tumor target—beneficial site for antiangiogenic cancer therapy?
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (2010)