The formation of Uranus and Neptune in the Jupiter–Saturn region of the Solar System

Article metrics

Abstract

Planets are believed to have formed through the accumulation of a large number of small bodies1,2,3,4. In the case of the gas-giant planets Jupiter and Saturn, they accreted a significant amount of gas directly from the protosolar nebula after accumulating solid cores of about 5–15 Earth masses5,6. Such models, however, have been unable to produce the smaller ice giants7,8 Uranus and Neptune at their present locations, because in that region of the Solar System the small planetary bodies will have been more widely spaced, and less tightly bound gravitationally to the Sun. When applied to the current Jupiter–Saturn zone, a recent theory predicts that, in addition to the solid cores of Jupiter and Saturn, two or three other solid bodies of comparable mass are likely to have formed9. Here we report the results of model calculations that demonstrate that such cores will have been gravitationally scattered outwards as Jupiter, and perhaps Saturn, accreted nebular gas. The orbits of these cores then evolve into orbits that resemble those of Uranus and Neptune, as a result of gravitational interactions with the small bodies in the outer disk of the protosolar nebula.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Temporal evolution of model calculations that produced a successful Solar System analogue.
Figure 2: The final orbital elements of most successful runs in each of the three series.

References

  1. 1

    Safronov,V. S. Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and the Formation of the Earth and Planets (Nauka, Moscow, 1969).

  2. 2

    Wetherill,G. W. An alternative model for the formation of the asteroids. Icarus 100, 307–325 (1992).

  3. 3

    Chambers,J. E. & Wetherill,G. W. Making the terrestrial planets: N-body integrations of planetary embryos in three dimensions. Icarus 136, 304–327 (1999).

  4. 4

    Agnor,C. B., Canup,R. & Levison,H. On the character and consequences of large impacts in the late stage of terrestrial planet formation. Icarus 142, 219–237 (1999).

  5. 5

    Bodenheimer,P. & Pollack,J. B. Calculations of the accretion and evolution of giant planets: the effects of solid cores. Icarus 67, 391–408 (1986).

  6. 6

    Pollack,J. B. et al. Formation of the giant planets by concurrent accretion of solids and gas. Icarus 124, 62–85 (1996).

  7. 7

    Lissauer,J. J., Pollack,J. B., Wetherill,G. W. & Stevenson,D. J. in Neptune and Triton (ed. Cruikshank, D. P.) 37–108 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1996).

  8. 8

    Stewart,G. & Levison,H. F. On the formation of Uranus and Neptune. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. XXIX, abstr. no. 1960 (1998).

  9. 9

    Kokubo,E. & Ida,S. Oligarchic growth of protoplanets. Icarus 131, 171–178 (1998).

  10. 10

    Morbidelli,A. in Solar System Formation and Evolution (eds. Lazzaro, D., Vieira Martins, R., Ferraz-Mello, S., Fernandez, J. & Beauge, C.) 83 (ASP Conf. Ser. 149, 1998).

  11. 11

    Levison,H. & Duncan,M. From the Kuiper belt to Jupiter-family comets: the spatial distribution of ecliptic comets. Icarus 127, 13–32 (1997).

  12. 12

    Duncan,M. & Levison,H. F. A scattered disk of icy objects and the origin of Jupiter-family comets. Science 276, 1670–1672 (1997).

  13. 13

    Luu,J. et al. A new dynamical class of object in the outer Solar System. Nature 387, 573–575 (1997).

  14. 14

    Fernandez,J. A. & Ip,W.-H. Some dynamical aspects of the accretion of Uranus and Neptune—The exchange of orbital angular momentum with planetesimals. Icarus 58, 109–120 (1984).

  15. 15

    Hahn,J. & Malhotra,R. Radial migration of planets embedded in a massive planetesimal disk. Astron. J. 117, 3041–3053 (1999).

  16. 16

    Rasio,F. A. & Ford,E. B. Dynamical instabilities and the formation of extrasolar planetary systems. Science 274, 954–956 (1996).

  17. 17

    Weidenschilling,S. J. & Marzari,F. Gravitational scattering as a possible origin for giant planets at small stellar distances. Nature 384, 619–621 (1996).

  18. 18

    Lin,D. N. C. & Ida,S. On the origin of massive eccentric planets. Astrophys. J. 477, 781–791 (1997).

  19. 19

    Levison,H. F., Lissauer,J. J. & Duncan,M. J. Modeling the diversity of outer planetary systems. Astron. J. 116, 1998–2014 (1998).

  20. 20

    Duncan,M., Levison,H. & Lee,M. H. A multiple timestep symplectic algorithm for integrating close encounters. Astron. J. 116, 2067–2077 (1998).

  21. 21

    Malhotra,R. The origin of Pluto's orbit: implications for the Solar System beyond Neptune. Astron. J. 110, 420–429 (1995).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Stewart and K. Zahnle for discussions, and L. Dones, B. Gladman, W. McKinnon, J. Parker, A. Stern, W. Ward and G. Wetherill for comments on an earlier draft. E.W.T. and M.J.D. were supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, H.F.L. was supported by NASA's Planetary Geology & Geophysics, Origins of Solar Systems, and Exobiology programme.

Author information

Correspondence to Martin J. Duncan.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thommes, E., Duncan, M. & Levison, H. The formation of Uranus and Neptune in the Jupiter–Saturn region of the Solar System. Nature 402, 635–638 (1999) doi:10.1038/45185

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.