Editorial | Published:

Africa's academies

Nature volume 450, page 762 (06 December 2007) | Download Citation

Robust scientific institutions won't be built in a day.

Last month in Dakar, Senegal, representatives of scientific academies, science ministers, donors and development specialists gathered to take stock of a multi-year project to develop stronger scientific academies in Africa, led by the US National Academies and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The African Science Academy Development Initiative (ASADI) has been undertaken on the assumption that both scientists and nations stand to benefit from the existence of robust, well respected and reasonably independent institutions that can speak forcefully and effectively for science. Elsewhere in the world, such bodies serve to sustain excellence within the scientific community itself, to foster informed public discourse on science-related issues and to provide policy-makers with sound advice on these issues, encouraging rational decision-making.

Some solid progress has been made since ASADI got under way in 2004. Initially, the initiative has concentrated on providing intensive support for academies in South Africa, Nigeria and Uganda. These projects are each at different stages of development. South Africa already had an academy structure, albeit one fragmented by the legacy of apartheid. Nigeria has a troubled history and vast, unmet needs. Uganda has a young academy, striving to make its presence felt in a relatively open political environment. ASADI also provides more modest support to academies in Senegal, Ghana, Cameroon and Kenya, and to the African Academy of Sciences in Nairobi.

The goals of the project are more abstract than those of most development efforts in science and medicine. But the establishment of credible institutions (such as scientific academies) is needed to underpin broader economic and social development and the dearth of such institutions is a critical problem in much of Africa.

Organizations such as the Royal Society in London and the National Academies in Washington DC have taken many decades to build up their respective positions. Although occasionally lampooned as self-important associations of elderly white males, they are in fact important components of good governance. Their voices command respect, even in the most disrespectful corners of the media, and their advice is widely sought.

ASADI is providing long-term support to establish staff and premises for its three target academies, which are starting to do useful work. The Academy of Science of South Africa, for example, produced a comprehensive study in August on AIDS and tuberculosis. The Ugandan academy is reporting on the use of DDT to control mosquitoes indoors. The Nigerian academy has held workshops on blood safety and infant mortality. Getting governments to follow through on such work remains a major challenge, however.

The African academies need to establish a level of recognition with their respective publics and governments, and then to make that recognition stick in a climate where influence is often ephemeral. Building up that recognition will require careful, unspectacular legwork over many years. The Gates Foundation will consider continuing funding for the project next year and will do well — if the quality of the emerging academies' work is high enough — to support it over the long haul.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/450762a

Authors

    Comments

    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

    Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing