Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Abstract

The efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) used for the treatment of localized prostate cancers has been demonstrated over the past decade. We present our early results after HIFU used as a single session in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. A total of 58 patients were treated using the Ablatherm HIFU device with or without transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HIFU failure was defined as the presence of a cancer remnant on repeated biopsies or three consecutive increases in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 1.0 ng/ml. The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 6–21 months). After HIFU treatment, 78% of patients had a decreased PSA level to <0.5 ng/ml within 3 months. The median value of the last PSA was 0.6 ng/ml and the median nadir PSA was 0.2 ng/ml. The success rates of HIFU were 85, 77 and 47% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. The HIFU failure rate was closely associated with clinical stage, presence of cancer on TURP chips and nadir PSA on univariate analysis. However, the only significant predictor for HIFU failure was the nadir PSA value by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The operation-related complications were minimal. Although both the period and number of patients were limited to evaluate the clinical efficacy, HIFU appears to be a safe and effective treatment option in selected patients with prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iselin CE, Robertson JE, Paulson DF . Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period. J Urol 1999; 161: 163–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC . Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin N Am 2001; 28: 555–565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Noldus J, Fernandez S et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beerlage HP, Thuroff S, Madersbacher S, Zlotta AR, Aus G, de Reijke TM et al. Current status of minimally invasive treatment options for localized prostate carcinoma. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 2–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D . High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 590–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombel M, Gelet A . Principles and results of high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004; 7: 289–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rebillard X, Gelet A, Davin JL, Soulie M, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X et al. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2005; 19: 693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 969–974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American society for therapeutic radiology and oncology consensus panel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37: 1035–1041.

  10. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Souchon R, Pangaud C, Abdelrahim AF et al. Treatment of prostate cancer with transrectal focused ultrasound: early clinical experience. Eur Urol 1996; 29: 174–183.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Pangaud C, Lasne Y . Local control of prostate cancer by transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound therapy: preliminary results. J Urol 1999; 161: 156–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaussy CG, Thuroff S . High-intensive focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2000; 14: 293–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lyonnet D, Dubernard JM . Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: factors influencing the outcome. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 124–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol 2003; 17: 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF . High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 2004; 63: 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaussy C, Thuroff S . The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep 2003; 4: 248–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallancien G, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Rozet F . Transrectal focused ultrasound combined with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: feasibility study. J Urol 2004; 171: 2265–2267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uchida T, Ohkusa H, Nagata Y, Hyodo T, Satoh T, Irie A . Treatment of localized prostate cancer using high-intensity focused ultrasound. BJU Int 2006; 97: 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen ME, Johnston DA, Tang K, Babaian RJ, Troncoso P . Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications. Cancer 2000; 89: 1800–1809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Augustin H, Erbersdobler A, Graefen M, Fernandez S, Palisaar J, Huland H et al. Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: a comparison between prostate cancers located in different anatomical zones. Prostate 2003; 55: 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavadi VS, Zagars GK, Pollack A . Serum prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prognostic implications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 30: 279–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Critz FA, Levinson AK, Williams WH, Holladay CT, Griffin VD, Holladay DA . Prostate specific antigen nadir achieved by men apparently cured of prostate cancer by radiotherapy. J Urol 1999; 161: 1199–1203; discussion 1195–1203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grant CRS 104502 from the Samsung Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Y Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Hong, J. & Choi, H. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 9, 439–443 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500901

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500901

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links