Abstract
The importance of an early pharmacological prophylaxis for erectile function following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy has been recently stressed by several authors. In spite of that, patient's compliance to erectile rehabilitation protocols seems to be low. The present review is an attempt to define the expected benefits of the currently proposed rehabilitative protocols in terms of cost-efficiency and quality of life. The conclusion is that current scientific evidence in support of an early postoperative use of erectile aids is based mainly on indirect proof of a cavernosal damage that may follow the temporary postoperative ‘erectile silence’. Intracavernosal injections or a vacuum device may represent the best first-line treatment option for the first few months from the procedure as their mechanism of action does not require intact neural tissue for erection. Thereafter oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy may be a reasonable choice for those patients who can achieve at least a partial erection. A phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor may not be effective when spontaneous erections are absent. It is possible, since the rehabilitation of sexual function aims to prevent cavernosal tissue damage by providing oxygenation to the erectile tissue, the choice of a potentially ineffective treatment may jeopardize the results of a reasonable nerve-sparing procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Montorsi F et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408–1410.
Montorsi F, Burnett AL . Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1–2.
Raina R et al. Long-term efficacy and compliance of intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction following radical prosatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 318–322.
Penson DF et al. Is quality of life different for men with erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer compared to men with erectile dysfunction due to other causes? Results from the exceed data base. J Urol 2003; 169: 1458–1461.
Smith DS et al. Patient preferences for outcomes associated with surgical management of prostate cancer. J Urol 2002; 167: 2117–2122.
Gralnek D, Wessells H, Cui H, Dalkin BL . Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 163: 1166–1170.
Bokhour BG, Clark JA, Inui TS . Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer: exploring the meanings of ‘erectile dysfunction’. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 649–655.
Penson DF et al. General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcome study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1147–1154.
Rabbani F et al. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 164: 1929–1934.
Walsh PC . Radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 2000; 163: 1802–1807.
Catalona WJ, Basler JW . Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1993; 150: 905–909.
Standford JL et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. JAMA 2000; 283: 354–360.
Talcott JA et al. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1117–1123.
Hara I et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 2045–2048.
Katz R et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2002; 168: 2078–2082.
Padma-Nathan H et al. Postoperative nightly administration of sildenafil citrate significantly improves the return of normal spontaneous erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 169 (Suppl): 1402.
McCullough AR . Prevention and management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 613–627.
Leungwattanakij S et al. Cavernous neurotomy causes hypoxia and fibrosis in rat corpus cavernosum. J Androl 2003; 24: 239–245.
User HM et al. Penile weight and cell subtype specific changes in a post-radical prostatectomy model of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2003; 169: 1175–1179.
Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS . A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 1462–1464.
Mulhall JP et al. Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. J Urol 2002; 167: 1371–1375.
Schwarts EJ, Wong P, Graydon RJ . Sildenafil preserves intracorporeal smooth muscle after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 771–774.
Aboseif S et al. Role of penile vascular injury in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 1994; 73: 75–80.
Fraiman MC, Lepor H, McCullough AR . Nocturnal penile tumescence activity in 81 patients presentino with erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1999; 161 (Suppl 4S): 179.
Zagaja GP, Mhoon DA, Aikens JE, Brendler CB . Sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 56: 631–634.
Montorsi F et al. The subsequent use of I.C. alprostadil and oral sildenafil is more efficacious than sildenafil alone in nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2002; 167 (Suppl): 279.
Soderdahl DW, Thrasher JB, Hansberry KL . Intracavernosal drug-induced erection therapy versus external vacuum devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 1997; 79: 952–957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gontero, P., Kirby, R. Proerectile pharmacological prophylaxis following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7, 223–226 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500737
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500737
Keywords
- radical prostatectomy
- nerve-sparing
- erectile dysfunction
- treatment
- rehabilitation
This article is cited by
-
Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction—science and clinical evidence
International Journal of Impotence Research (2010)
-
Vacuum erection devices to treat erectile dysfunction and early penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy
Current Urology Reports (2008)
-
Pharmacologic penile rehabilitation
Current Sexual Health Reports (2006)
-
Recovery of erection after pelvic urologic surgery: our experience
International Journal of Impotence Research (2005)