Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A prospective randomized comparison of extensive prostate biopsy to standard biopsy with assessment of diagnostic yield, biopsy pain and morbidity

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases volume 7, pages 126–131 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

In a prospective randomized study, we compare standard prostate biopsy to extensive biopsy utilizing intravenous conscious sedation (IVCS). Initial biopsy patients (n=197) were randomized to either standard biopsy using intrarectal lidocaine gel (6–12 biopsies, mean 10.1) or extensive biopsy (24 biopsies) using IVCS. Cancer detection and urinary symptoms were no different between groups. However, biopsy pain was rated significantly lower and satisfaction significantly higher in the extensive biopsy group. Temporary urinary retention occurred in 4% of the extensive biopsy group. Extended biopsy with 24 samples does not improve cancer detection compared to standard biopsy when 10 cores are obtained. Extensive biopsy is very well tolerated and associated with less pain and more satisfaction than standard biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. Hodge KK, McNEal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA . Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Norberg M et al. The sextant protocol for ultrasound guided core biopsies, of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H . Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for detection of cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabbani F et al. Incidence and clinical significance of false negative sextant prostate biopsies. J Urol 1998; 159: 1247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karakiewicz PI et al. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997; 49: 55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL . Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Presti JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K . The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Babaian RJ et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gore JL et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 1554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Presti JC et al. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 2003; 169: 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis M, Sofer M, Kim SS, Soloway MS . The procedure of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a survey of patient preparation and biopsy technique. J Urol 2002; 167: 566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alavi AS et al. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001; 166: 1343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leibovici D et al. Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind placebo controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167: 563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL . Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 2000; 163: 158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart CS, Lobovick BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM . Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsy. J Urol 2001; 166: 86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang SS et al. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166: 2178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Naughton CK et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 164: 388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Robert H Riffenburgh, PhD, who performed the statistical analysis. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA

    R L Sur, P G Borboroglu, J L Roberts & C L Amling

Authors
  1. R L Sur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P G Borboroglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J L Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C L Amling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C L Amling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sur, R., Borboroglu, P., Roberts, J. et al. A prospective randomized comparison of extensive prostate biopsy to standard biopsy with assessment of diagnostic yield, biopsy pain and morbidity. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7, 126–131 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500713

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500713

Keywords

  • prostate biopsy
  • anesthesia

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links