Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

PSA testing in general practice

Abstract

A questionnaire was sent to 400 general practitioners (GPs), concerning prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Regarding the indications for PSA testing, 80% of GPs test men with urinary tract symptoms, 65% test men with a positive family history, 62% test on patient request, and 21% test men with unrelated symptoms. When PSA is measured, 91% of GPs inform their patient, and 71% discuss the significance of an abnormal result. The mean age range for PSA testing was from 50 years, without an upper age limit. The mode PSA threshold for referral was 6.6 ng/ml. De facto PSA screening appears to be widely practised.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. URL: http://:nelh.nhs.uk/psatesting/.

  2. De Koning HJ et al. Large scale randomised prostate cancer screening trials: programme performances in the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the prostate, lung and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer 2002; 97: 237–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horninger W et al. Prostate cancer screening in the Tyrol, Austria: experience and results. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 1322–1335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford ED et al. Efficiency of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in screening, using 4.0 ng/ml and age-specific reference range as a cut-off for abnormal values. Prostate 1999; 38: 296–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. URL: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001.

  6. Labrie F et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomised controlled trial. Prostate 1999; 38: 83–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perron L et al. PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. Can Med J 2002; 166: 586–591.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morris J, McNoe B, Adam H . Screening for prostate cancer: what do general practitioners think? N Z Med J 1997; 110: 178–182.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunting PS, Goel V, Williams I, Iscoe NA . Prostate specific antigen testing in Ontario: reasons for testing patients without diagnosed prostate cancer. Can Med J 1999; 160: 70–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McNaughton Collins M, Stafford RS, Barry MJ . Age-specific patterns of prostate-specific antigen testing among primary care physician visits. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 169–172.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luboldt HJ et al. The Early Detection Project Group of the German Urological Association Early detection of prostate cancer in Germany: a study using digital rectal examination and 4.0 ng/ml prostate-specific antigen as cut-off. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 131–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gustafsson O et al. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density and age-adjusted PSA reference values in screening for prostate cancer—a study of a randomly selected population of 2,400 men. Scand J Urol Nephr 1998; 32: 373–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spitz MR et al. Familial patterns of prostate cancer: a case–control analysis. J Urol 1991; 146: 1305–1307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao SL, Lu-Yao G . Interval after prostate specific antigen testing and subsequent risk of incurable prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166: 861–865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito K et al. Correlation of prostate-specific antigen before prostate cancer detection and clinicopathologic features: evaluation of mass screening populations. Urology 2000; 55: 705–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maattanen L et al. European randomised study of prostate cancer screening: first-year results of the Finnish trial. Br J Cancer 1999; 79: 1210–1214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirby RS et al. Screening for carcinoma of the prostate: a GP based study. B J Urol 1994; 74: 64–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Cooner WH . The use of age specific reference ranges for serum prostate specific antigen in men 60 years old or older. J Urol 1995; 153: 1160–1163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellis W et al. Serial prostate specific antigen, free to total prostate specific antigen ratio and complexed prostate specific antigen for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166: 93–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nijs HG et al. Why do men refuse or attend population-based screening for prostate cancer. J Public Health Med 2000; 22: 312–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Little.

Appendix : Full text of the PSA screening questionnnaire

Appendix : Full text of the PSA screening questionnnaire

See Table A1

Table 1 Table a1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, B., Ho, K., Gormley, G. et al. PSA testing in general practice. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6, 154–158 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500646

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500646

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links