Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Gyrus™ bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up

Abstract

The Gyrus™ system uses bipolar electrocautery with saline irrigation to vaporize prostatic tissue and is compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a randomized prospective study with 1 y follow-up. Outcomes measured were fluid absorption, blood loss, period of catheterization, hospital stay, symptom scores, quality of life, flow rates, and post-void residual volumes at 3, 6, and 12 months. All measured parameters were similar, although re-catheterization rates were higher (30% vs 5%) in the Gyrus group. Clot evacuation rates were higher in the TURP group (19% vs 0%). The Gyrus™ device is safe and produces results that are similar to TURP at 1 y.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doll HA et al. Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol 1992; 147: 1566–1573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Botto H et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol 2001; 15: 313–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hahn RG . Irrigating fluids in endoscopic surgery. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 669–680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry MJ et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1992; 148: 1549–1557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W D Dunsmuir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunsmuir, W., McFarlane, J., Tan, A. et al. Gyrus™ bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6, 182–186 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500631

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500631

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links