Abstract
We evaluated six alternative methods of prostate volume determination by transrectal ultrasound, three based on planimetry and three based on measurement of prostate diameters. Prostate volume measurements were made on an average of 6.5 occasions over a 3 y period on 41 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, using standard techniques. We defined the average of multiple planimetries as the prostate reference volume. Agreement with the reference volume and reproducibility at repeat testing was in the same range for single planimetry and volume determinations based on the formulas height (H)×width (W)×length (L)×π/6 and W×W×H×π/6, but was poorer using the formula W×W×W×π/6. Using the average result of two successive planimetry measurements increased the reproducibility of planimetry, being statistically significantly better than for one single planimetry (P=0.024) or for the formula W×W×H×π/6 (P=0.048). Our study suggests that the simple formula based methods of prostate volume determination provide results that are only marginally inferior to one single planimetry, but results are improved by performing two planimetry measurements.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarnink RG, De La Rosette JJMCH, Debruyne FMJ, Wijkstra H . Reproducibility of prostate volume measurements from transrectal ultrasonography by an automated and a manual technique Br J Urol 1996 78: 219–223
Hendrikx AJM et al. Audex medical, a new system for digital processing and analysis of ultrasonographic images of the prostate Scand J Urol Nephrol 1991 137: 95–100
Kimura A, Kurooka Y, Kitamura T, Kawabe K . Biplane planimetry as a new method for prostatic volume calculation in transrectal ultrasonography Int J Urol 1997 4: 152–156
Nathan MS et al. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Br J Urol 1996 77: 401–407
Terris MK, Stamey TA . Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound J Urol 1991 145: 984–987
Bates TS, Reynard JM, Peters TJ, Gingell JC . Determination of prostatic volume with transrectal ultrasound: a study of intra-observer and interobserver variation J Urol 1996 155: 1299–1300
Myschetzky PS et al. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens Scand J Urol Nephrol 1991 137: (Suppl) 107–111
Matthews GJ, Motta J, Fracchia JA . The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations J Clin Ultrasound 1996 24: 501–505
Bonilla J et al. Intra- and interobserver variability of MRI prostate volume measurements Prostate 1997 31: 98–102
Andersen JT et al and the Scandinavian BPH Study Group.. Can finasteride reverse the progress of benign prostatic hyperplasia? A two-year placebo-controlled study Urology 1995 46: 631–637
Jepsen JV, Leverson G, Bruskewitz C . Variability in urinary flow rate and prostate volume: an investigation using the placebo arm of a drug trial J Urol 1998 160: 1689–1694
Rhodes T et al. High variability change in prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound over time within untreated men J Urol 1996 155: 461A (suppl) (abstract 600)
Jones DR et al. Assessment of volume measurement of the prostate using per-rectal ultrasonography Br J Urol 1989 64: 493–495
Hastak SM, Gammelgaard J, Holm HH . Transrectal ultrasonic volume determination of the prostate—a preoperative and postoperative study J Urol 1982 127: 1115–1118
Elliot TL et al. Accuracy of prostate volume measurements in vitro using three-dimensional ultrasound Academ Radiol 1996 3: 401–406
Bonilla J et al. Patterns of prostate growth observed in placebo treated patients in the PLESS trial over four years J Urol 1998 159: 333 (suppl) (abstract 1281)
Ray PS et al. Methodologic variations in medical treatment of BPH J Urol 1989 149: 534A (suppl) (abstract 1478)
Tong S et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging Ultrason Med Biol 1998 5: 673–681
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eri, L., Thomassen, H., Brennhovd, B. et al. Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5, 273–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500568
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500568
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Patients with Peyronie’s disease achieve complete plaque regression after multimodal treatment with antioxidants: a case series
Journal of Medical Case Reports (2022)
-
Prostate volume prediction on MRI: tools, accuracy and variability
European Radiology (2022)
-
Functional outcomes of GreenLight 180-W photoselective vaporization in patients with large (≥ 80 cc) prostates: an analysis of over 3000 men in the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) database
World Journal of Urology (2022)
-
Impact of the presence of a median lobe on functional outcomes of greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP): an analysis of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) Database
World Journal of Urology (2021)
-
Serum omentin-1 level in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
BMC Urology (2020)