A personal DNA sequence is not yet practically useful. But it could be, argues Steven E. Brenner, if we had the right resources available to interpret genomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden
Genome Medicine Open Access 13 July 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Levy S, et al. PLoS Biol. 5, e254 (2007).
http://jimwatsonsequence.cshl.edu/cgi-perl/gbrowse/jwsequence/
https://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=448&format=pdf
Maurer, S. M. Res. Policy 35, 839–853 (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Join the discussion at http://www.GenomeCommons.org
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brenner, S. Common sense for our genomes. Nature 449, 783–784 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/449783a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/449783a
This article is cited by
-
ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden
Genome Medicine (2023)
-
Exercise Addiction and Psychophysiological Health in Korean Collegiate Students
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (2018)
-
Personalisierte Medizin durch individuelle Genome
Medizinische Genetik (2010)
-
Only Connect
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy (2010)
-
Results of rush to sequence genomes may be nonsense
Nature (2008)