Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Science degrees without the science

Some UK universities offer science degrees in complementary medicine. David Colquhoun argues that these are not science but anti-science, and asks who is to blame.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Colquhoun, D. DC's Improbable Science Page

  2. Barry, C. A. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 2646–2657 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Editorial Lancet 336, 690 (2005).

  4. Holmes, O. W. Homeopathy and its Kindred Delusions (1842).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldacre, B. The Guardian 17 February (2007).

    Google Scholar 


  7. QAA Other Subjects Allied to Medicine (2000).

  8. Desmond, A. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London (Univ. Chicago Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, M. Universities and the NHS: Partners in Care (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


I am grateful to P. Williams of the QAA for information and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colquhoun, D. Science degrees without the science. Nature 446, 373–374 (2007).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing