Article | Published:

Thermodynamic control of hurricane intensity

Nature volume 401, pages 665669 (14 October 1999) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

To establish useful warning systems for hurricanes, it is necessary to accurately predict both hurricane intensity and track. But although the forecasting of hurricane tracks has improved over the past 30 years, the factors that control the intensity of hurricanes are still poorly understood, leading to almost no reliability in forecasts of hurricane intensity evolution. Efforts to improve intensity forecasts have focused almost exclusively on characterizing the dynamical interactions between hurricanes and their atmospheric environment. Here I use a simple numerical model to demonstrate that, in most cases, the evolution of hurricane intensity depends mainly on three factors: the storm's initial intensity, the thermodynamic state of the atmosphere through which it moves, and the heat exchange with the upper layer of the ocean under the core of the hurricane. Such a limited number of controlling factors offers hope that, given an accurate forecast of a hurricane's track, its intensity can be reliably forecast using very simple models.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & An operational evaluation of a statistical hurricane intensity prediction scheme (SHIPS). Preprints of the 22nd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology 280–281 (American Meteorological Soc., Boston, 1997).

  2. 2.

    & Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1925–95. Weath. Forcast. 13, 621–631 (1998).

  3. 3.

    & A statistical hurricane intensity prediction scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic basin. Weath. Forcast. 9, 209–220 (1994).

  4. 4.

    , & Environmental influences on the rapid intensification of Hurricane Opal (1995) over the Gulf of Mexico. Preprints of the 23rd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology 983–984 (American Meteorological Soc., Boston, 1999).

  5. 5.

    Upper ocean response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 11, 153–175 (1981).

  6. 6.

    , & Tropical cyclogenesis in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Preprints of the 18th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology (American Meteorological Soc., Boston, 1989).

  7. 7.

    & The ocean's effect on the intensity of tropical cyclones: Results from a simple coupled atmosphere-ocean model. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 642–651 (1999).

  8. 8.

    & The mutual response of a moving tropical cyclone and the ocean. Beitrage Phys. Atmos. 64, 125–141 (1991).

  9. 9.

    The Lagrangian parcel dynamics of moist symmetric instability. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 2368–2376 (1983).

  10. 10.

    & Transformed Eliassen-balanced vortex model. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1571–1583 (1983).

  11. 11.

    The behavior of a simple hurricane model using a convective scheme based on subcloud-layer entropy equilibrium. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 3959–3968 (1995).

  12. 12.

    An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 1062–1071 (1986).

  13. 13.

    & Dissipative heating and hurricane intensity. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 65, 233–240 (1998).

  14. 14.

    A statistical analysis of tropical cyclone intensity. Mon. Weath. Rev. 127, (in the press).

  15. 15.

    Internal wake of a moving storm, Part I: Scales, energy budget, and observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 949–965 (1983).

  16. 16.

    A physical interpretation of SST-feedback. Preprints of the 22nd Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology 439–440 (American Meteorological Soc., Boston, 1997).

  17. 17.

    & Hurricane climatological potential intensity maps and tables. (cited 01/05/99) 〈http://www-paoc.mit.edu/emanuel/pcmin/climo.html〉/22/03/97)

  18. 18.

    Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean (NOAA Prof. Pap. No. 13, US Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1982).

  19. 19.

    & A numerical study of the nonlinear interaction of Hurricane Camille with the Gulf of Mexico loop current. Oceanol. Acta 16, 341–348 (1993).

  20. 20.

    in Proc. Offshore Tech. Conf. 213–222 (Offshore Tech. Conf., Richardson, Texas, 1992).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The vertical wind shear data were supplied by Dr. J. Kaplan of the NOAA/ERL Hurricane Research Division. I thank H. Willoughby for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Kerry A. Emanuel

Authors

  1. Search for Kerry A. Emanuel in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry A. Emanuel.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/44326

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.