Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chernobyl and the future

Too soon for a final diagnosis

Nature volume 440, pages 993–994 (2006)Cite this article

Twenty years ago, the nuclear accident at Chernobyl exposed hundreds of thousands of people to radioactive fallout. We still have much to learn about its consequences, argue Dillwyn Williams and Keith Baverstock.

The radiation exposure from the Chernobyl accident differed greatly from that created by the atomic bombs in Japan, yet only fragmented studies have tracked the human consequences of Chernobyl, in contrast to the coordinated approach of Japan's Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (now the Radiation Effects Research Foundation). Without a similar approach, speculation about Chernobyl's human cost will be unconstrained by hard evidence, and interested parties will be able to exaggerate or underplay the consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/Chernobyl/index.shtml

  2. Brenner, D. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13761–13766 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner, D. J. & Sachs, R. K. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 44, 253–256 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu, Y. et al. Radiat. Res. 130, 249–266 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, D. E. et al. Radiat. Res. S17–S67 (1994).

  6. Kazakov, V. S. et al. Nature 359, 21 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baverstock, K. et al. Nature 359, 21–22 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pukkala, E. et al. Int. J. Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.21885 (2006).

  9. Williams, D. Nature Rev. Cancer 2, 543–549 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The International Chernobyl Project Tech. Rep. (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thyroid Carcinogenesis Research Group, Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK

    Dillwyn Williams

  2. Department of Environmental Science, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, 70211, Finland

    Keith Baverstock

Authors
  1. Dillwyn Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith Baverstock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, D., Baverstock, K. Too soon for a final diagnosis. Nature 440, 993–994 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/440993a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/440993a

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing