Dear Editor,
Death receptor/death ligand interactions have been recognized as important triggers of cell death in various cell types. So far, best understood are the signaling events that are activated upon binding of the Fas ligand to the Fas (CD95) receptor, and subsequently lead to apoptosis in the target cell. Fas-mediated apoptosis plays a crucial role in many physiological and pathophysiological events, such as immune homeostasis, immune privilege, tissue turnover, and cell-mediated cytotoxicity.1, 2 Similar to Fas ligand, TRAIL/Apo-2 ligand (Tumor Necrosis Factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) has been proposed to represent an important cytotoxic effector molecule, by which cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells eliminate their target cells. TRAIL has particularly received strong scientific attention due to its proposed role in tumor immune surveillance and its potential therapeutic application in cancer patients.3
Apart from tumor immunity, however, TRAIL has also been implicated in various other aspects of immune cell regulation. For example, neutralization of TRAIL causes an exacerbation of experimental rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune encephalomyelitis and diabetes, suggesting that TRAIL-induced apoptosis or effector cell modulation represents an important regulatory process in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Recently, Lamhamedi-Cherradi et al.4 have proposed TRAIL/TRAIL receptor-mediated cell death as an underlying mechanism of thymic negative selection. Thymocytes from TRAIL-deficient mice were found to be more resistant to antigen- or CD3/T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated apoptosis, and soluble TRAIL receptor was reported to block thymic cell death. This finding, however, is quite controversial and has therefore been questioned by other investigators.5, 6, 7 For example, Simon et al.5 have not been able to block thymic negative selection by soluble TRAIL receptor, and Cretney et al.6 have found normal antigen-driven negative selection in the very same TRAIL-deficient mice. Furthermore, CD3/TCR-mediated apoptosis in vivo has been reported to require the release of systemic glucocorticoids and may thus not necessarily reflect the biology of negative selection.8 Particularly incompatible with this proposed role of TRAIL in thymic negative selection is the observation that the adaptor molecule FADD (Fas-associated death domain) is a crucial element in the TRAIL-induced signaling pathways leading to apoptosis, however, overexpression of dominant-negative FADD does not alter thymic negative selection.7, 9 Thus, the role of TRAIL–TRAIL receptor interaction in the establishment of central tolerance is far from being well accepted. The different publications describing TRAIL or TRAIL-R expression in the thymus, or their involvement in thymic negative selection are summarized in Table 1. They demonstrate that TRAIL and TRAIL receptor are expressed in the thymus and thymocytes, and that thymocytes are sensitive to TRAIL, yet come to different conclusions regarding the role of TRAIL–TRAIL receptor interaction in TCR-induced thymocyte apoptosis.
The discrepancy between these different reports is difficult to reconcile and may partially depend on the different experimental systems used. We have thus reinvestigated the role of TRAIL in activation-induced apoptosis in thymocytes using TRAIL-deficient mice, and have extended our experiments to other apoptosis triggers. Both, in vitro and in vivo activation of thymocytes by CD3/TCR ligation using anti-CD3É›-crosslinking antibodies caused massive induction of apoptosis in CD4+CD8+ immature thymocytes (Figure 1a and b). Importantly, double-positive thymocytes from wild type and TRAIL-deficient mice expressed low but detectable levels of TRAIL-R (as assessed by flow cytometry), which became upregulated upon stimulation with anti-CD3 (data not shown). In agreement with the finding of Lamhamedi-Cherradi et al.,4 we found a significant inhibition of anti-CD3-induced apoptosis in TRAIL-deficient thymocytes, in vitro as well as in vivo. This would indicate that TRAIL might play an important role in CD3/TCR-mediated thymocyte apoptosis and possibly also negative selection.
Death ligand/death receptor interactions are not only involved in activation-induced apoptosis and cell-mediated cytotoxicity, but have also been implicated in apoptosis induction upon DNA damage.1, 10 DNA damage may induce the expression of death receptors and also death ligands through p53- and/orJun kinase/NFκB-dependent mechanisms. Since thymocytes are exquisitely sensitive to DNA damage, we analyzed thymocyte apoptosis in response to UV and γ-irradiation in vitro and in vivo as well as other cell death triggers, that is, the glucocorticoid dexamethasone and Fas ligation in TRAIL-deficient and control mice. Surprisingly, we observed that UV- and γ-irradation as well as glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis was significantly attenuated in TRAIL-deficient thymocytes. In marked contrasts, however, induction of Fas receptor-mediated apoptosis occurred with similar kinetics in wild type and TRAIL-deficient thymocytes (Figure 1a and b).
Apoptosis resistance of TRAIL-deficient thymocytes does thus not appear to be restricted to CD3/TCR-mediated apoptosis, but extends to other apoptosis triggers, with the exception of Fas. While it is conceivable that DNA damage-induced apoptosis in thymocytes may involve TRAIL/TRAIL receptor interaction, there is no evidence so far that glucocorticoids signal via TRAIL. So far, the key mediators of glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis remain elusive, albeit members of the BH3-only protein family may contribute to this form of apoptosis.11, 12, 13 It is well established that antigen-, glucocorticoid-, UV and γ-irradation-induced apoptosis in thymocytes proceeds predominantly via the activation of proapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family associated with changes in the mitochondrial membrane permeability, causing the release of proapoptotic factors (e.g. cytochrome C or Smac/DIABLO) and subsequent caspase activation. Thus, apoptosis induced by these triggers is effectively antagonized by the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2 or its prosurvival homologues. In contrast, Fas ligation in thymocytes leads to a direct activation of caspase-8 and -3 rather than amplification of the signal through Bid cleavage and cytochrome C release, as proposed for certain cell types (e.g. hepatocytes14). Consistently, Fas ligation-induced apoptosis of thymocytes is not modified by overexpression of a Bcl-2 transgene.15, 16
Our observations suggest that TRAIL may sensitize thymocytes to mitochondria-dependent but not mitochondria-independent apoptosis pathways. Interestingly, death receptor ligation does not necessarily cause apoptosis, but may also lead to Jun kinase and NFκB activation enhancing cell survival or activation. These nonapoptotic pathways do not necessarily require FADD, but can proceed via the adaptor molecules RIP-kinase.17 It is therefore conceivable that TRAIL receptor ligation of immature thymocytes may cause activation of MAP kinases and/or NFκB, which in turn may alter apoptosis sensitivity of the cells in a FADD-independent manner, for example, by modulating expression levels of IAP family members. Jun kinase signals, on the other hand, have been shown to modulate expression levels and or function of various pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 homologues, including Bim. Jun kinase regulates Bim transcription in neurons18 and phosphorylation of Bim on Ser 69, which enhances its proapoptotic activity by inhibiting proteosomal degradation.19
We have analyzed the expression pattern of pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 members in thymocytes of wild type and TRAIL-deficient mice (i.e. Bim, Bmf, Bid, Bad, Bcl-w, Bcl-x and Bcl-2). No significant differences in protein expression were found in untreated thymocytes from TRAIL-deficient and control mice. However, upon TCR stimulation in vitro and in vivo wild-type thymocytes showed a more pronounced increase in both, Bim mRNA expression and protein levels than TRAIL-deficient thymocytes (Figure 1c and d). Bim therefore represents an attractive target of TRAIL-mediated sensitization since it is well established to be crucial in thymic negative selection.20 Bim-deficient thymocytes show a similar or even stronger resistance to apoptosis induction by anti-CD3, UV, γ-irradiation and dexamethasone than TRAIL-deficient mice (N Corazza, T Brunner, unpublished results). In addition, the proapototic activity of Bim is not only reflected in its expression levels per se, and TRAIL-mediated signals may possibly modulate its subcellular localization and/or its release from microtubules that is an upstream signaling event in CD3/TCR-mediated apoptosis in vivo.20 However, it remains to be further determined how TRAIL modulates thymocyte sensitivity. Most likely, sensitization is a process, which requires a certain amount of time, since, in contrast to Lamhamedi-Cherradi et al.,4 we were unable to specifically block apoptosis in wild-type thymocytes by the addition of soluble TRAIL receptor (data not shown). Similarly, injection of recombinant TRAIL into TRAIL-deficient mice for 12 h did not sensitize thymocytes to subsequent ex vivo apoptosis induction, nor could we detect TRAIL-induced apoptosis in vitro (data not shown).
In conclusion, TRAIL appears to have a significant apoptosis-modulating activity in thymocytes in vivo since TRAIL-deficient thymocytes show a marked decrease in apoptosis sensitivity to mitochondria-dependent pathways but not Fas-induced apoptosis. However, our data also suggest that this apoptosis-modulating activity is not restricted to antigen-driven thymic negative selection and is thus likely not a direct mechanism of thymic central deletion. Bim has been implicated in various forms of thymocyte apoptosis, including negative selection. Here, we support the notion that TRAIL ligation may regulate thymocyte apoptosis through the control of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, possibly through the control of Bim expression.
References
Brunner T et al. (2003) Sem. Immunol. 15: 167–176
Pinkoski MJ et al. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 278: G354–G366
LeBlanc HN and Ashkenazi A (2003) Cell Death Differ. 10: 66–75
Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE et al. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4: 255–260
Simon AK et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5158–5163
Cretney E et al. (2003) J. Exp. Med. 198: 491–496
Green DR (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4: 207–208
Brewer JA et al. (2002) J. Immunol. 169: 1837–1843
Newton K et al. (1998) EMBO J. 17: 706–718
Kasibhatla S et al. (1998) Mol. Cell 1: 543–551
Bouillet P et al. (1999) Science 286: 1735–1738
Wang Z et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278: 23861–23867
Villunger A et al. (2003) Science 302: 1036–1038
Yin XM et al. (1999) Nature 400: 886–891
Strasser A et al. (1995) EMBO J. 14: 6136–6147
Huang DC et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 14871–14876
Lin Y et al. (2000) Mol. Cell Biol. 20: 6638–6645
Harris CA and Johnson Jr EM (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276: 37754–37760
Putcha GV et al. (2003) Neuron 38: 899–914
Bouillet P et al. (2002) Nature 415: 922–926
Abdalla SA et al. (2004) J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66: 643–650
Camacho IA, Nagarkatti M and Nagarkatti PS (2004) Toxicol. Sci. 78: 96–106. Epub 2004 January 2012.
Pan G et al. (1997) Science 276: 111–113
Wiley SR et al. (1995) Immunity 3: 673–682
Newton K, Harris AW and Strasser A (2000) EMBO J. 19: 931–941
Chaudhary PM et al. (1997) Immunity 7: 821–830
Walczak H et al. (1997) EMBO J. 16: 5386–5397
Acknowledgements
We like to thank Immunex Corp., Seattle, for the TRAIL-deficient mice, Andreas Strasser (Melbourne) for BIM-deficient mice, Pascal Schneider (Epalinges) for recombinant TRAIL and TRAIL receptor fusion protein, and the members of the labs for continuous support. This work was supported by grants from the Novartis Foundation, Swiss National Science Foundation, Oncosuisse and Bernese Cancer League to TB and Austrian Science Fund (FWF) to AV.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corazza, N., Brumatti, G., Jakob, S. et al. TRAIL and thymocyte apoptosis: not so deadly?. Cell Death Differ 11 (Suppl 2), S213–S215 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401525
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401525
This article is cited by
-
The immune system on the TRAIL of Alzheimer’s disease
Journal of Neuroinflammation (2020)
-
The role of apoptosis in the development and function of T lymphocytes
Cell Research (2005)