Research on embryonic stem cells holds huge promise for understanding and treating disease. Many people oppose such research on religious and ethical grounds, but two new methods may bypass some of these objections.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Chung, Y. et al. Nature 439, 216–219 (2006).
Meissner, A. & Jaenisch, R. Nature 439, 212–215 (2006).
Weissman, I. L. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1576–1579 (2002).
Hwang, W. S. et al. Science 308, 1777–1783 (2005).
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2002).
Hurlbut, W. Monitoring Stem Cell Research 53–108 (President's Council on Bioethics, Washington DC, 2004).
Strumpf, D. et al. Development 132, 2093–2102 (2005).
Hurlbut, W. Monitoring Stem Cell Research 90–93 (President's Council on Bioethics, Washington DC, 2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weissman, I. Politic stem cells. Nature 439, 145–147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/439145a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/439145a
This article is cited by
-
Musculoskeletal tissue engineering by endogenous stem/progenitor cells
Cell and Tissue Research (2012)
-
No end in sight for stem-cell odyssey
Nature (2006)
-
Blastomeres and stem cells
Nature (2006)