In female mammals, one of two X chromosomes has to be shut down during early development. To what extent does this ‘imprinted X-chromosome inactivation’ involve the history of the chromosome?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Lyon, M. Nature 190, 372–373 (1961).
Okamoto, I. et al. Nature 438, 369–373 (2005).
Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. Nature 256, 640–642 (1975).
Lucchesi, J., Kelly, W. & Panning, B. Annu. Rev. Genet. PMID:16120055 24 August (2005).
Turner, J. et al. Curr. Biol. 14, 2135–2142 (2004).
Huynh, K. & Lee, J. Nature 426, 857–862 (2003).
Huynh, K. & Lee, J. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 410–418 (2005).
Brockdorff, N. Trends Genet. 18, 352–358 (2002).
Tada, T. et al. 127, 3101–3105 (2000).
Wang, P. J., Page, D. C. & McCarrey, J. R. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2911–2918 (2005).
Reik, W. & Walter, J. Nature Genet. 27, 255–256 (2001).
About this article
Cite this article
Reik, W., Ferguson-Smith, A. The X-inactivation yo-yo. Nature 438, 297–298 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/438297a