Microbiology

Bacterial speech bubbles

Many bacteria socialize using diffusible signals. But some of these messages are poorly soluble, so how do they move between bacteria? It seems they can be wrapped up in membrane packages instead.

On page 422 of this issue, Mashburn and Whiteley1 describe the unexpected convergence of two seemingly unrelated areas of microbiological research: how bacteria talk to their friends, and how they attack their enemies. The authors studied the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which releases a hydrophobic molecule called the ‘pseudomonas quinolone signal’ (PQS) to send messages to other bacteria of the same species. The surprise is that, rather than being secreted as single molecules, PQS is released in bubble-like ‘vesicles’ that also contain antibacterial agents and probably toxins aimed at host tissue cells as well.

Figure 1: Friend or foe?
figure1

EYE OF SCIENCE/SPL

Gram-negative proteobacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa communicate with each other by secreting chemical messengers. Mashburn and Whiteley1 show that they also release such signals in vesicles that contain toxins against other bacteria and the cells of their host.

Various groups of bacteria use diffusible chemicals to signal to their own kind, and this method of communication seems to have evolved independently several times2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative proteobacterium and, like many proteobacteria, it secretes molecules called acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs). The concentration of these signal molecules increases with cell population density, enabling the bacteria to sense how many of their kind surround them — a phenomenon known as quorum sensing. Whole sets of genes are switched on only at high cell densities, including genes for bioluminescence, DNA transfer, pigment production, and genes required for infecting plants, animals and humans2. But AHL molecules are readily broken down by other bacteria, and some AHL signals are poorly soluble in water, so they cannot travel far in an aqueous environment — both factors that would seem to limit their potential as communication signals. PQS, although not an AHL-type signal, is also poorly water-soluble and readily broken down by other bacteria. So how do these molecules manage to spread the word from one bacterium to another?

Mashburn and Whiteley found clues from another bacterial communication system — one aimed at enemies rather than friends. Many Gram-negative bacteria release minute vesicles (about 50 nm in diameter)3 from their outer membranes as a means of delivering toxins to host cells and other bacteria (sometimes referred to type VI protein export4). The vesicles consist of a lipid bilayer surrounding an aqueous core and they can therefore transport lipid-soluble toxins (lipopolysaccharide endotoxin) on their surface and protein toxins in their core. They release their poisonous cargo by fusing with the lipid bilayer of target cells. Mashburn and Whiteley show that these vesicles can also release the PQS signal to other bacteria, thereby sidestepping the problems of poor water-solubility and degradation.

Remarkably, P. aeruginosa has three quorum-sensing systems that use AHL signals. Apart from the PQS system, there is the LasR/LasI system, which signals using 3-oxo-dodecanoylhomoserine lactone (OdDHL), and the RhlR/RhlI system, which uses butyryl-homoserine lactone (BHL). Of these three signals, OdDHL and PQS are poorly water-soluble, and all three can be degraded by other bacteria. Mashburn and Whiteley found that PQS (but not OdDHL or BHL) is not dispersed between bacteria as single, water-soluble molecules, but rather is concentrated within membrane vesicles, presumably buried within the lipid bilayer.

PQS is one of at least 55 quinolones and quinolines made by P. aeruginosa, some of which have potent antibacterial activity. The membrane vesicles, in addition to signalling to kindred P. aeruginosa cells, showed potent antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. Most of the antimicrobial activity could be extracted by organic solvents, indicating that toxicity was due to quinolines rather than to the protein component of the vesicles.

The production of the vesicles seems to be regulated by PQS, because when PQS synthesis was abolished by a mutation in the pqsH gene, vesicle production virtually ceased. Addition of extra PQS restored vesicle formation, even if protein synthesis was blocked by an antibiotic. So, whatever PQS is doing, it is probably happening at the post-translational level, rather than causing alterations in gene expression. Most of the added PQS was found in vesicles, which also contained other quinolones possessing antimicrobial activity. It seems that when PQS is inserted into the outer membrane — whether it was made by that bacterium or added from another source — it can destabilize the membrane and spontaneously form vesicles containing itself, other quinolones and presumably endotoxin and periplasmic proteins. These vesicles can then signal to other pseudomonads, kill unrelated bacteria, and deliver toxic lipopolysaccharides and proteins to host cells.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen that is a particular problem in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. Greater understanding about how these bacteria communicate with each other and attack host cells could lead to novel treatment strategies for P. aeruginosa infections. The way in which other bacteria generate these ubiquitous membrane vesicles, and what they might contain, is unknown, but most proteobacteria do not synthesize PQS, so other mechanisms must be involved. Moreover, hydrophobic long-chain AHLs were not found in membrane vesicles in this study, so how these signalling molecules diffuse or are transported between bacteria has still to be discovered.

References

  1. 1

    Mashburn, L. M. & Whiteley, M. Nature 437, 422–425 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (in the press)

  3. 3

    Kadurugamuwa, J. L. & Beveridge, T. J. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40, 615–621 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Wai, S. N. et al. Cell 115, 25–35 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winans, S. Bacterial speech bubbles. Nature 437, 330 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/437330a

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.