Several mammals — including sheep, mice, cows, goats, pigs, rabbits, cats1, a mule2, a horse3 and a litter of three rats4 — have been cloned by transfer of a nucleus from a somatic cell into an egg cell (oocyte) that has had its nucleus removed. This technology has not so far been successful in dogs because of the difficulty of maturing canine oocytes in vitro. Here we describe the cloning of two Afghan hounds by nuclear transfer from adult skin cells into oocytes that had matured in vivo. Together with detailed sequence information generated by the canine-genome project5,6, the ability to clone dogs by somatic-cell nuclear transfer should help to determine genetic and environmental contributions to the diverse biological and behavioural traits associated with the many different canine breeds7,8.
Successful somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) depends on the quality, availability and maturation of the animal's unfertilized oocytes. Unlike other mammals, dogs ovulate at first meiotic prophase, and their oocytes mature for 2 to 3 days in the oviduct's distal regions. Previously, intra- and interspecific canine embryos have been constructed by canine SCNT into canine and bovine oocytes, respectively, but this did not result in viable offspring9.
We collected oocytes matured in vivo at metaphase II about 72 hours after ovulation by flushing the oviducts. (For details of methods, see supplementary information.) Donor fibroblasts were obtained from an ear-skin biopsy of a male Afghan hound and cultured for two to five passages (in which fully grown cells are transferred to a new culture dish). For SCNT, the chromosomes of the unfertilized canine oocytes were removed by micromanipulation, and a single donor cell was transferred into each enucleated oocyte. The couplets were fused and only successfully fused couplets (75%) were activated. The activated oocytes were then transferred into the oviducts or uterine horns of recipient dogs at times appropriate to the embryos' developmental stages. We collected an average of 12 oocytes from each female, and a total of 1,095 reconstructed canine embryos were transferred into 123 recipients.
Three pregnancies were confirmed by ultrasound scans at 22 days' gestation in recipients after transfer of constructs. Pregnancy was established only after embryo transfer of very-early-stage nuclear-transfer constructs (that is, less than 4 hours after oocyte activation). This transfer of early-stage embryos is a crucial factor in successful assisted reproductive technology for dogs. One fetus miscarried and two others were carried to term.
We named the first cloned dog Snuppy (for Seoul National University puppy); it is shown in Fig. 1a with the male Afghan fibroblast donor. Snuppy was delivered by caesarian section after 60 days (full term) from a yellow Labrador surrogate mother (Fig. 1b); his birth weight was 530 g. The second SCNT dog, NT-2, was carried by a mixed-breed surrogate, and was also delivered at 60 days, weighing 550 g (normal range for Afghans in a litter, 482–680 g). He experienced neonatal respiratory distress during the first week, seemed to recover, but died on day 22 as a result of aspiration pneumonia; no major anatomical anomalies were evident post mortem.
We tested whether the cloned dogs were genetically identical by microsatellite analysis of genomic DNA from the donor Afghan, the cloned dogs and the surrogates (see supplementary information). Analysis of eight canine-specific microsatellite loci confirmed that the cloned dogs were genetically identical to their donor dog. However, the efficiency of cloning is still very low (2 dogs from 123 recipients, or 1.6%) compared with the rates for cats1 and horses3.
In addition to the benefits that cloning technology may generally provide (the preservation of rare species and therapeutic cloning — once canine embryonic stem cells become available), this technology could become a useful research tool for studying the genetics of outcrossed populations.
Shin, T. et al. Nature 415, 859 (2002).
Woods, G. L. et al. Science 301, 1063 (2003).
Galli, C. et al. Nature 424, 635 (2003).
Zhou, Q. et al. Science 302, 1179 (2003).
Ostrander, E. A. & Giniger, E. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 475–480 (1997).
Sutter, N. B. & Ostrander, E. A. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 900–910 (2004).
Lohi, H. et al. Science 307, 81 (2005).
Modiano, J. F. et al. Cancer Res. 65, 5654–5661 (2005).
Westhusin, M. E. et al. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 57, 287–293 (2001).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, B., Kim, M., Jang, G. et al. Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells. Nature 436, 641 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/436641a
Conservation Genetics Resources (2021)
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2020)
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019)
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019)
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2018)