At least half the human genome consists of mobile elements, such as LINEs, some of which can jump around the genome. These elements have been crucial in genome evolution, but they may also contribute to human diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Translational repression by a miniature inverted-repeat transposable element in the 3′ untranslated region
Nature Communications Open Access 03 March 2017
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
McClintock, B. Yb. Carnegie Inst. Wash. 48, 142–154 (1949).
Muotri, A. R. et al. Nature 435, 903–910 (2005).
Dewannieux, M., Esnault, C. & Heidmann, T. Nature Genet. 35, 41–48 (2003).
Branciforte, D. & Martin, S. L. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 2584–2592 (1994).
Ostertag, E. M. et al. Nature Genet. 32, 655–660 (2003).
Prak, E. T., Dodson, A. W., Farkash, E. A. & Kazazian, H. H. Jr Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1832–1837 (2003).
Miki, Y. et al. Cancer Res. 52, 643–645 (1992).
Turner, B. M. Cell 111, 285–291 (2002).
Lander, E. S. et al. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Waterston, R. H. et al. Nature 420, 520–562 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ostertag, E., Kazazian, H. LINEs in mind. Nature 435, 890–891 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435890a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435890a
This article is cited by
-
Translational repression by a miniature inverted-repeat transposable element in the 3′ untranslated region
Nature Communications (2017)
-
A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements
Nature Reviews Genetics (2007)
-
IRAP and REMAP for retrotransposon-based genotyping and fingerprinting
Nature Protocols (2006)
-
New LINEs of thought
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2005)