To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals
Science and Engineering Ethics Open Access 13 February 2024
-
Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan – a confession
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 31 January 2024
-
Clinical evaluation of marketed and non-marketed orthodontic products: are researchers now ahead of the times? A meta-epidemiological study
Progress in Orthodontics Open Access 23 October 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
OSTP Federal Policy on Research Misconduct http://www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.html (2005).
Teitelbaum, S. L. Nature 420, 739–740 (2002).
Korn, D. Nature 420, 739 (2002).
Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. & Solomon, F. Science 294, 2293–2294 (2001).
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1992).
Steneck, N. H. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 2004).
Swazey, J. M., Anderson, M. S. & Louis, K. S. Am. Sci. 81, 542–553 (1993).
Ranstam, J. et al. Control Clin. Trials 21, 415–427 (2000).
Geggie, D. J. Med. Ethics 27, 344–346 (2001).
Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K. & Christakis, N. A. J. Clin Epidemiol. 50, 1129–1136 (1997).
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1995).
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1993).
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 2002).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Research on Research Integrity Program, an ORI/NIH collaboration, with financial support from the National Institute of Nursing Research and an NIH Mentored Research Scientist Award to R.d.V. We thank the three anonymous reviewers, Nick N. Steneck and M. Sheetz for their insightful input and responses to earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinson, B., Anderson, M. & de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
This article is cited by
-
Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan – a confession
BMC Medical Ethics (2024)
-
Scientific Truth in a Post-Truth Era: A Review*
Science & Education (2024)
-
How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals
Science and Engineering Ethics (2024)
-
Sustaining medical research – the role of trust and control
Health Economics Review (2023)
-
Clinical evaluation of marketed and non-marketed orthodontic products: are researchers now ahead of the times? A meta-epidemiological study
Progress in Orthodontics (2023)