To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
OSTP Federal Policy on Research Misconduct http://www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.html (2005).
- 2
Teitelbaum, S. L. Nature 420, 739–740 (2002).
- 3
Korn, D. Nature 420, 739 (2002).
- 4
Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. & Solomon, F. Science 294, 2293–2294 (2001).
- 5
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1992).
- 6
Steneck, N. H. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 2004).
- 7
Swazey, J. M., Anderson, M. S. & Louis, K. S. Am. Sci. 81, 542–553 (1993).
- 8
Ranstam, J. et al. Control Clin. Trials 21, 415–427 (2000).
- 9
Geggie, D. J. Med. Ethics 27, 344–346 (2001).
- 10
Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K. & Christakis, N. A. J. Clin Epidemiol. 50, 1129–1136 (1997).
- 11
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1995).
- 12
Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1993).
- 13
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 2002).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Research on Research Integrity Program, an ORI/NIH collaboration, with financial support from the National Institute of Nursing Research and an NIH Mentored Research Scientist Award to R.d.V. We thank the three anonymous reviewers, Nick N. Steneck and M. Sheetz for their insightful input and responses to earlier drafts.
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinson, B., Anderson, M. & de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
Published:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain
Science and Engineering Ethics (2021)
-
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2021)
-
Perception and Conflict in Conservation: The Rashomon Effect
BioScience (2021)
-
Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective
Science and Engineering Ethics (2021)
-
Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study
Accountability in Research (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.