Sir
In the Editorial “Dealing with design” (Nature 434, 1053; 200510.1038/4341053a), Nature claims that scientists have not dealt effectively with the threat to evolutionary biology posed by ‘intelligent design’ (ID) creationism. Rather than ignoring, dismissing or attacking ID, scientists should, the editors suggest, learn how religious people can come to terms with science, and teach these methods of accommodation in the classroom. The goal of science education should thus be “to point to options other than ID for reconciling science and belief”. In this way, students' faith will not be challenged by scientific truth, and evolution will triumph.
This suggestion is misguided: the science classroom is the wrong place to teach students how to reconcile science and religion. For one thing, many scientists deem such a reconciliation impossible because faith and science are two mutually exclusive ways of looking at the world. For such scientists, Nature apparently prescribes hypocrisy. The real business of science teachers is to teach science, not to help students shore up worldviews that crumble when they learn science. And ID creationism is not science, despite the editors' suggestion that ID “tries to use scientific methods to find evidence of God in nature”. Rather, advocates of ID pretend to use scientific methods to support their religious preconceptions. It has no more place in the biology classroom than geocentrism has in the astronomy curriculum.
Scientists are of course free (some would say duty-bound) to fight ID outside the classroom, or to harmonize religion with science. But students who cannot handle scientific challenges to their faith should seek guidance from a theologian, not a scientist. Scientists should never have to apologize for teaching science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Peter Atkins Lincoln College, University of Oxford Colin Blakemore Medical Research Council, London Richard Dawkins Oxford University Museum, University of Oxford Steve Jones Galton Laboratories, University College London Richard Lewontin Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University John Maddox 9 Pitt Street, London W8 4NX Paul Nurse The Rockefeller University, New York Linda Partridge Department of Biology, University College London James D. Watson Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, New York Steven Weinberg Department of Physics, University of Texas, Austin Lewis Wolpert Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coyne, J. When science meets religion in the classroom. Nature 435, 275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435275a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435275a