Innocent scientists detained while real culprits went free.
Flawed interrogations of scientists in the aftermath of the Iraqi war hampered investigations of the country's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programme and added to the risk that knowledge and technology would spread to neighbouring countries, US government advisers have concluded.
Iraqi researchers willing to cooperate with the United States were detained without cause while key WMD individuals were never targeted or even identified, according to new information released by the Iraq Survey Group (ISG). The ISG is a team of British, American and Australian inspectors charged with finding WMD after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. Coalition policies also created an atmosphere of fear that deterred potentially helpful researchers from talking and increased the likelihood that WMD scientists might defect to neighbouring states such as Iran or Syria, or find work with insurgent forces in Iraq, the authors said in a report released on 25 April.
“This report is being honest,” says David Albright, a former United Nations weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington DC. “The search was horribly mismanaged. The military treated scientists as common criminals.”
Albright raised concerns soon after Baghdad fell to US forces, two years ago last month. He and other non-proliferation experts complained that Iraqi scientists were reluctant to cooperate for fear of being taken prisoner and wanted protection from prosecution before they would talk (see Nature 423, 371; 2003 ). The ISG has now acknowledged these problems.
The public listing of the 55 most-wanted members of Hussein's regime is one tactic singled out for criticism. This left other Iraqis uncertain as to whether they were on a longer blacklist that included 300 names. As many Iraqis were at the time being detained for a wide range of reasons, “these factors combined to cause Iraq WMD participants at virtually all levels to attempt to remain undetected,” the ISG says.
Those that were detained were often subject to bungled interrogation, the authors add. They found that army interrogators, who lacked technical training, glossed over key details when interviewing detainees and created inconsistent and sometimes error-filled intelligence briefs. WMD experts involved in the interviews usually only stayed in Baghdad for a month or two, often leaving just as they were gaining knowledge useful to the ISG investigation.
The ISG stresses that there is no evidence that defectors to neighbouring “hostile states” are actually working on WMD. But it adds that there are many reports of “Iraqis with general chemical or biological expertise helping insurgents to produce chemical and biological agents”.
Around 100 of the 300 blacklisted individuals are still being detained. “As far as the WMD investigation is concerned, there is no further purpose in holding many of these individuals,” the report concludes.
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
About this article
Cite this article
Giles, J., Brumfiel, G. US bungled investigation into weapons research in Iraq. Nature 435, 5 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435005a