A natural history of India

Inventing Global Ecology: Tracking the Biodiversity Ideal in India, 1947–1997

Ohio University Press: 2004. 352 pp. $55, £36.95 (hbk); $26, £17.50 (pbk) 0821415409 | ISBN: 0-821-41540-9
On the move: Indians have made huge strides to improve their own conservation efforts. Credit: R. SEITRE/STILL PICTURES

The title of this book couldn't be more apt. It is hard to be sure whether the word ‘tracking’ is a cleverly crafted metaphor or is just used to mean ‘tracing the path of something’. Nevertheless, the word conjures up visions of an English gentleman (preferably with the name Major Bill Witherspool) in a pith helmet, shielding himself from thorny acacia branches, extricating a 1948 Morris Minor from a mud pool, and trying to have a conversation in Swahili while pursuing a herd of Loxodonta africana (to ‘shoot’ them one way or the other) over the intractable terrain of sub-Saharan Africa. Or if you would prefer a less colonial scene, you might think of a young Indian postgrad trying to fulfil the specifications of her World Bank grant by pursuing the flighty (and nocturnal) Nilgiri marten as it scampers across the rainforest of the Kalakad Tiger Reserve. Or you might want to indulge in visions of technological empowerment and imagine instead a technocrat lounging at his computer station logging satellite data that beep in by the minute from a piece of silicon embedded within the dorsal skin of a brown palm civet.

Michael Lewis has done pretty much all of the above. He has faithfully traced and eloquently recorded the labyrinthine evolution of wildlife science (now called conservation biology). From its governing ideology and practice in India, he moves through the highways and byways (many of them literal, rather than figurative) of history, international politics (and politicking), Indian nationalism and nation-building. He even takes in the ‘anthropology of science’, the changing face of global scientific debate, and the evolution of field biology itself.

He has straddled the academic worlds of both biology (as an undergraduate) and history (graduate and doctoral). It therefore seems natural that he should apply one to the other, and thus magnify insights into both. After all, they are intellectual disciplines located not separately in a vacuum, but in an interactive matrix of other fields of enquiry.

Inventing Global Ecology is based on Lewis's doctoral dissertation, so it reads as a fairly scholarly piece of writing. It smacks of painstaking research, which is its greatest claim to credibility. In fact, the information is often so detailed that the reader senses impatience within.

More importantly, the reader gets the distinct impression that Lewis has made a sincere attempt to embody ‘deep democracy’. He is politically correct in the most profound and meaningful sense. He has the ability to transcend his inner barriers of rank, race, culture, affluent ‘developed world’-ness and geopolitics. He writes with humility, grace, honesty and openness about the geopolitical realities of a people and its wildlife that are positioned often antagonistically and disadvantageously to his own. It is people such as Lewis, and the debate that books like this can initiate, that have the potential to make a real difference to difficult and chronic global problems.

The prose is smooth, unselfconscious and eloquent. For example, he uses elegant metaphors while writing about the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS): “Perhaps more than a gateway, the BNHS has been a colossus astride Indian conservation-oriented ecology over the last fifty years.” He also demonstrates his insight into the society and its activities. Of Salim Ali, its driving force for many years, Lewis writes: “His story is the story of the BNHS”. He perceptively explains that ecology “was not introduced to India by Westerners, but by the degreeless Ali, by way of his German training”. It's certainly true that Ali brought the BNHS to the highest possible standards of ecological research in India. But it is because of Ali's pioneering work on Indian ornithology that even now the BNHS is known as an institute specializing only in birds.

Lewis also examines the various reasons for the shift in funding for the BNHS from Britain to the United States. Whether this shift was strategic or coincidental, it is worth adding that, in the past decade or so, the funding for BNHS projects has come mainly from Britain, completing the circle.

In the subsequent chapters, Lewis chronicles the evolution of the BNHS and various controversies during this process. Without being judgemental, he covers various facets of these debates in lucid prose. These chapters will be essential reading for anyone with an interest in the BNHS.

Chapter 2 focuses on what could be called the anthropology of science — the social, cultural and political constructs upon which science is based and conducted. There is a growing dialectic among social scientists around the related issues of what constitutes science, whether or not its nature and practice are independent of the context in which it exists, and on the appropriateness of transplanting scientific practices from one part of the world to another. Lewis uses this as a springboard to question whether the import of scientific techniques, legislative measures (such as prohibiting human habitation in wildlife sanctuaries) and methods of enquiry (for example, using expensive radio collars in developing countries) in wildlife science and management is meaningful or useful. This discussion is pertinent not only to wildlife science but to all spheres of enquiry.

Lewis does not mince his words. For instance, he observes that neither Raghavendra Gadagkar of the Centre for Ecological Sciences in Bangalore nor US ecologists such as E. O. Wilson “are willing to abandon theoretical ecology to take up taxonomy though. Gadagkar encourages students to do so, and Wilson ecologists of the developing world to do the same. Neither will do it himself.” And while talking about differences between India and the West, he writes that villages in India, “even those who lose crops and occasionally relatives, have existed in close contact with dangerous wildlife for centuries without driving those animals to extinction. Before the British there was no evidence of Indian ‘predator elimination hunts’ in the style of the Texas rattlesnake drives or the turn-of-the-century wolf bounties in the United States, aimed at the eradication of every member of a given species.” There is something irresistibly refreshing about Lewis's willingness to speak his mind.

In keeping with his seemingly earnest desire to faithfully reproduce all his findings, all of his conversations (or rather, the relevant sections of them) seem to be recorded verbatim. The book is thus peppered with quotes in ‘Hinglish’, and misplaced modifiers, fractured sentence construction and other endearing linguistic idiosyncrasies are rife.

Despite its scholarly character, this book is user-friendly for lay-readers, thanks in no small measure to the author's superb story-telling ability. The more informed reader might skip over a couple of pages here and there with a ‘been there, done that’ shrug, but I suspect that few ecologists are privy to the intricate history of their chosen field of work. The book thus serves to round out their education by providing a historical and philosophical perspective.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apte, D. A natural history of India. Nature 434, 564–565 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/434564a

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.