Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

General relativity

Frame-dragging confirmed

According to a prediction of general relativity, the spinning mass of the Earth affects the motion of satellites. A measurement of this ‘frame-dragging’ effect confirms Einstein's theory.

General relativity predicts that a spinning mass distorts space-time — one of a variety of ‘gravitomagnetic’ phenomena that are absent in Newtonian gravity. Unfortunately, gravitational forces are so weak that it is useless to try to detect this warping of space-time unless the mass is very large and spinning rapidly — an astronomical body, say, such as the Earth or the Sun, or a neutron star. After many years' work, and through the analysis of millions of ‘laser-ranging’ measurements made from more than 50 Earth-based stations, Ciufolini and Pavlis1 have confirmed the twisting effect of the spinning Earth on the orbits of two artificial satellites (page 958 of this issue). The remarkable precision they have achieved is due in large part to recent improvements in the modelling of Earth's gravitational field.

According to general relativity, a spinning flywheel imparts a twist to space and time in its proximity that can affect a nearby gyroscope. If a frictionless gyroscope is placed near the flywheel's axis of rotation, the gyroscope's spin axis will be dragged along in the direction of the flywheel's rotation. However, if the gyroscope is placed near the flywheel's perimeter, its spin axis will be dragged in a direction opposite to the flywheel's rotation. First analysed by Joseph Lense and Hans Thirring, soon after Einstein published his general theory of relativity, the phenomenon is known as the Lense–Thirring effect — or ‘frame-dragging’, because the spin axes of ideal gyroscopes could be used to track the directions of coordinate axes in an inertial reference frame.

Frame-dragging is one aspect of the class of relativistic phenomena loosely known as gravitomagnetism, through their analogy with the effects of ordinary magnetic forces on moving electric charges. General relativity describes gravity in terms of a set of ten independent quantities (the components of a second-rank tensor). The gravitomagnetic terms, however, vanish unless the mass producing the gravitational field is moving. Among the effects caused by gravitomagnetic forces are precessions (similar to the wobble of the axis of a spinning top) of the orbital plane of a satellite around a spinning body (such as Earth), or precessions of the orbit of an Earth satellite as the Earth–satellite system orbits the Sun. This latter effect is usually called de Sitter or geodetic precession.

Precise measurement of these effects predicted by relativistic gravity theories is crucial, as they have important implications for our view of the cosmos. Gravitomagnetic effects can be significant in many astrophysical systems. For example, in the binary pulsar B1913+16, geodetic precession of the orbits may cause the pulsed beam from this star to precess out of our line of sight in a few dozen years, and to reappear some centuries later2. However, the uncertainties in such distant systems are usually too large for astronomical objects to be used for precision tests of gravitomagnetic effects.

In the case of the Earth–Moon system, the Moon's orbit may be thought of as a gyroscope with its spin axis perpendicular to the Moon's orbital plane. A change in the direction of this axis can be measured by observing the change in the nodal angle; this is the angle between an astronomical reference line (the first point of Aries, in Earth's equatorial plane) and the line of intersection between Earth's equatorial plane and the Moon's orbital plane. According to general relativity, the geodetic precession of the nodal angle is only a little more than five-millionths of a degree per century, which amounts to motion of the node (on the orbit) of about 3 metres per month. This prediction has been verified3 to an accuracy of about 0.7%, through many years of accurate laser ranging — bouncing laser signals off retroreflectors placed on the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts — and by the development of extremely sophisticated models of the perturbed orbital motion and rotations of the Moon. However, frame-dragging of the Moon's orbit caused by the spin of the Earth is negligible, because the effect falls off rapidly with distance and the Earth is not spinning particularly fast.

But near-Earth satellites suffer larger perturbations owing to gravitomagnetic effects. These perturbations are still extremely tiny, and require enormous effort to measure, as Ciufolini and Pavlis1 have shown. The two satellites used in their analysis are LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2 (for Laser Geodynamics Satellite). LAGEOS was launched in 1976; the satellite is compact, completely passive, and consists of a heavy sphere covered with retroreflectors. LAGEOS 2 was launched in 1992 from the Space Shuttle. Accurate laser ranging to these satellites is used to develop better models of Earth's gravity field. This field is not spherical, but has many ripples because of the variations in Earth's mass distribution (Fig. 1). As a result, any frame-dragging experiment must take account of large orbital perturbations that are a solely due to ordinary Newtonian gravity.

Figure 1: General relativity and Earth's gravity field.
figure1

GEOFORSCHUNGSZENTRUM-POTSDAM NASA

The gravity field is not spherical, as the relief on this map measured using the GRACE satellites shows. These features must also be factored into tests of ‘frame-dragging’, an effect predicted by the general theory of relativity. Ciufolini and Pavlis1 have used measurements of the changing orbit of the LAGEOS satellites (one shown in inset) to confirm frame-dragging, or, more formally, the Lense–Thirring effect. Their measurement, to an accuracy of 10%, is the most precise so far.

In fact, uncertainties in some of the ripples in Earth's gravity field are large enough to mask frame-dragging effects almost completely: for a satellite at an altitude of 12,000 km, frame-dragging of the node is only about 1.9 metres per year, whereas the nodal precession due to oblateness of the Earth is many thousands of kilometres per year. Geodesy missions such as CHAMP and GRACE4,5, whose purpose is to further refine models of Earth's gravity field and study crustal motions, have been essential in reducing the uncertainties. Ciufolini and Pavlis1 have used two observable parameters — the nodal precession rates of both LAGEOS satellites — to eliminate the principal uncertainty caused by Earth's oblateness. From the remaining data, which consist of more than 100 million laser-ranging observations between Earth and the satellites, the frame-dragging effect could be measured.

The result — the first reasonably accurate measurement of frame-dragging — confirms the general theory of relativity to within a conservative error estimate of 10%. Further analysis is anticipated as additional geodesy missions are undertaken to improve our knowledge of Earth's gravity field. And results are eagerly awaited from NASA's Gravity Probe B, which was launched into polar orbit in April this year. This satellite had been under development for more than 40 years, and seems to be performing well. Its array of gyroscopes and readout systems should produce an even more precise measurement of gravitomagnetic precession, to an accuracy better than 1%. Precise observations of such theoretical predictions will improve our understanding of the cosmos. In all experiments performed up to now, general relativity has been accurately confirmed.

References

  1. 1

    Ciufolini, I. & Pavlis, E. C. Nature 431, 958–960 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Kramer, M. Astrophys. J. 509, 856–860 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Williams, J. G., Newhall, X. X. & Dickey, J. O. Phys. Rev. D 53, 6730–6739 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/GRACE/grace2.html

  5. 5

    Reigber, C. et al. J. Geodyn. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashby, N. Frame-dragging confirmed. Nature 431, 918–919 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/431918a

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing