Reduce X-ray doses for children, urge researchers.
Hundreds of fatal cases of cancer are being induced in children every year by hospital scans that could be replaced by other diagnostic methods, researchers have claimed.
The researchers' concern centres on the use of computed tomography (CT) scans; these create images of internal organs by combining X-rays taken from different angles. An initial analysis by David Brenner, a radiation biologist at Columbia University in New York, suggests that a single year of paediatric CT scans will ultimately cause 2,500 cancer deaths in the United States alone. But a survey of radiologists suggested that a third of these scans could be avoided, adds Brenner, who presented his work at an international conference in London — “Children with Leukaemia: Incidence, Causal Mechanisms and Prevention” — on 7 September.
The use of childhood CT scans has mushroomed since 1990, when a new generation of devices cut the scanning time from 1 minute to 1 second. The shorter scans have been a boon to clinicians, who use them to study dangerous conditions such as appendicitis in younger and less cooperative children.
Yet the technique exposes patients to tens of times more radiation than conventional X-ray examinations. Brenner says the doses are comparable to those received by people around two kilometres away from the atomic bomb blasts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Extrapolating from the bomb studies, he says that a single CT scan on a newborn girl has a 1 in 800 chance of causing fatal cancer.
Debate about the safety of CT has intensified in the United States this year. Brenner, for example, has highlighted the risks of adult full-body scans (D. Brenner and C. D. Elliston Radiology 232, 735–738; 2004). But he and Elaine Ron, an epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, who worked with him on the paediatric studies, say the risks to children are only just beginning to be quantified.
Brenner says that the benefits of appropriately using the technique almost always outweigh the risks, but adds that many scans could be avoided. A straw poll taken at a 2001 radiology conference, held in Chicago, Illinois, showed that delegates believed that up to 30% of paediatric scans were unnecessary (Pediatr. Radiol. 32, 242–244; 2002).
The US Food and Drug Administration, which regulates medical devices, already advises clinicians to use lower radiation doses in children. But a 2001 survey of practice in one US hospital indicated that radiologists may not be doing this (A. Paterson, D. P. Frush and L. F. Donnelly Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 297–301; 2001). Kieran McHugh, a paediatric radiologist at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London, says UK clinicians are becoming more aware of the issue. “But I still see images taken at adult settings,” he adds. “You could use a quarter of the dose.”
A proposed epidemiological study by researchers at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, may provide better data on the risks. Mark Pearce and Louise Parker hope to study the hospital records of 100,000 children who received scans. But Pearce cautions that several such studies will be needed to properly assess the risk of CT scans.
Related links in Nature Research
About this article
J. Mater. Chem. B (2014)
Synovial sarcoma in children and adolescents: A critical reappraisal of staging investigations in relation to the rate of metastatic involvement at diagnosis
European Journal of Cancer (2012)
Analysis of radiation exposure to the orthopaedic trauma patient during their inpatient hospitalisation
La radiologia medica (2011)
Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography in Patients with Necrotizing Pancreatitis: How Much Is Too Much?
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (2010)