NASA is delaying a mission to explore the fundamental make-up of the Universe, riling astronomers and physicists who consider it a top priority.
About three-quarters of all the mass and energy in the Universe may be dark energy. In a ground-breaking collaboration, NASA and the US Department of Energy (DOE) were set to explore this poorly understood entity on the Joint Dark Energy Mission, which supporters hoped would be launched into space by 2014 (see Nature 425, 887; 200310.1038/425887a).
But the collaboration is now on hold, as NASA re-tools for possible manned flights to the Moon and Mars. Two other missions in NASA's ‘Beyond Einstein’ astrophysics programme — one designed to probe microwaves left over from the Big Bang and the other to search for black holes — also failed to show up in NASA's five-year budget outlook, released on 2 February. Physicists had expected the missions to be in the plan if they were to be completed on the schedule that the space agency allocated to them last year.
The dark energy mission was listed as a top priority in a National Academy of Sciences study of interdisciplinary research in astronomy and physics, published in April 2002. “It's a serious casualty,” says Roger Blandford, who heads the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology at Stanford University in California.
The DOE remains committed to the project — at least for now. Saul Perlmutter, a cosmologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, is the primary investigator for one proposed version of the mission — the supernova/acceleration probe, or SNAP. He says that he is disappointed by NASA's decision but adds that the research can progress without the space agency's involvement. Robin Staffin, director of the DOE's high-energy physics division, says the department will spend between $7 million and $8 million next year developing detectors for the mission.
But researchers acknowledge that it will ultimately require NASA's support to carry out a mission that is expected to cost about $900 million.
NASA programme manager Paul Hertz downplayed the decision to omit it from the agency's five-year budget plan. “Nothing was cancelled,” he says. “But the timeline has been stretched out.” He says that the Office of Space Science, which had overseen the project, will continue to push for the mission to go ahead.
But Rocky Kolb, who was part of an independent NASA advisory board that originally recommended the mission, says it may prove a tough sell. “The immediate problem is that no one knows how to use dark energy to get to Mars,” he quips.
About this article