Abstract
A recent and prevalent mutation in the chemokine receptor CCR5 in humans of northern European ancestry has been proposed to provide protection against bubonic plague1,2. Here we infect both normal and CCR5-deficient mice with the bacterium Yersinia pestis, the cause of the plague epidemics that wiped out one-third of Europeans in the Middle Ages3, and find no difference in either bacterial growth or survival time between the two groups. Unless the pathogenesis of Yersinia infection differs markedly between mice and humans, our results indicate that CCR5 deficiency in people is unlikely to protect against plague.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
A 32-base-pair deletion in the coding region of CCR5, a mutation designated as CCR5Δ32, was first identified in individuals who had been exposed to HIV but who seemed to be resistant to infection4. This CCR5Δ32 allele is mainly confined to caucasians5,6, and its protective effect in homo-zygotes against transmission of the most common HIV-1 isolates arises because both CCR5 and CD4 are needed as co-receptors for entry of the virus into the cell.
Because the CCR5Δ32 allele shows evidence of very strong selection, it has been suggested that it may protect against another disease associated with high mortality1,2. A candidate agent is Yersinia pestis, which emerged shortly after the estimated origin of the CCR5Δ32 mutation (about 800 years ago), and killed some 25 million people in the Black Death plague of 1346–52.
If plague was responsible for driving this selection, the CCR5Δ32 genotype should alter the host response to Y. pestis infection to improve the survival rate. But, because plague is no longer common among caucasians, the allele has not been tested for a protective effect. We therefore compared the susceptibility of two groups of mice, with and without CCR5 deficiency, to infection and death following challenge with Yersinia.
The homozygous CCR5Δ32 genotype is associated with intracellular retention of a truncated CCR5 protein and ablation of the chemokine response to macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (ref. 6), whereas hetero-zygotes have a reduction in surface expression of CCR5 and slower progression from HIV infection to AIDS5. The lack of CCR5 at the cell surface has no obvious deleterious effect in humans. Mice with homozygous deletion of CCR5 have subtle immunological abnormalities, including in controlling infection by intracellular organisms such as Listeria, Cryptococci and Leishmania7,8,9.
To test whether CCR5 deficiency protects mice against Yersinia infection, we challenged them with lethal inocula of wild-type Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIIIpYV (C57BL/6 CCR5-deficient mice) or Pgm – Y. pestis KIM substrain D27 (BALB/c CCR5-deficient mice). There was no significant difference in the bacterial load in the caecum or Peyer's patches at two or four days post-infection between C57BL/6 CCR5-deficient and CCR5-expressing mice following oral infection (Fig. 1a). Macrophages from CCR5-deficient animals showed little to no difference in bacterial growth of Y. pseudotuberculosis or Y. pestis compared with those from CCR5-expressing mice.
These results argue against CCR5 being essential for infection by Y. pestis or Y. pseudotuberculosis. However, they do not eliminate the possibility that a protective effect caused by CCR5 deletion may reduce mortality without changing bacterial spread. We therefore evaluated the effect of CCR5 deficiency on survival after Y. pestis infection in the more susceptible BALB/c mouse strain, but found no significant difference in survival between CCR5-deficient BALB/c female mice and BALB/c females with normal CCR5 expression (Fig. 1b).
Male CCR5-deficient mice survived for a shorter time (Fig. 1b; P < 0.0001). We therefore challenged male and female BALB/c mice with a lower dose of Y. pestis and again found that the males showed significantly reduced survival (Fig. 1c; P = 0.0006). As increased susceptibility was also seen in limited numbers of male SCID mice (Fig. 1c), this gender-related defect could be affected by innate immunity. The poorer survival of CCR5-deficient male mice (Fig. 1b) is therefore likely to be related to their gender and not to CCR5 deficiency. Gender may also be a factor in Yersinia infection in humans, because males seem to be more susceptible to bubonic plague than females10.
Our results show that CCR5 deficiency in mice does not protect against infection or death caused by experimental Yersinia infection, making it unlikely that the CCR5Δ32 allele protects against plague. A modelling study11 reaches a similar conclusion, with smallpox instead of plague being proposed as the disease that selected for the CCR5Δ32 allele.
References
Stephens, J. C. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1507–1515 (1998).
Libert, F. et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 399–406 (1998).
Perry, R. D. & Fetherston, J. D. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10, 35–66 (1997).
Liu, R. et al. Cell 86, 367–377 (1996).
Dean, M. et al. Science 273, 1856–1862 (1996).
Huang, Y. et al. Nature Med. 2, 1240–1243 (1996).
Zhou, Y. et al. J. Immunol. 160, 4018–4025 (1998).
Huffnagle, G. B. et al. J. Immunol. 163, 4642–4646 (1999).
Sato, N. et al. J. Immunol. 163, 5519–5525 (1999).
Butler, T. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83, 458–460 (1989).
Galvani, A. P. & Slatkin, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15276–15279 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mecsas, J., Franklin, G., Kuziel, W. et al. CCR5 mutation and plague protection. Nature 427, 606 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/427606a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/427606a
This article is cited by
-
Plague as a cause for familial Mediterranean fever
Nature Immunology (2020)
-
FPR1 is the plague receptor on host immune cells
Nature (2019)
-
Archaeogenetics in evolutionary medicine
Journal of Molecular Medicine (2016)
-
Evolutionary molecular medicine
Journal of Molecular Medicine (2012)
-
“Are Humans Evolving?” A Classroom Discussion to Change Student Misconceptions Regarding Natural Selection
Evolution: Education and Outreach (2011)