Most mutations are likely to be deleterious, and so the spontaneous mutation rate is generally held at a very low value1. Nonetheless, evolutionary theory predicts that high mutation rates can evolve under certain circumstances2,3,4. Empirical observations have previously been limited to short-term studies of the fates of mutator strains deliberately introduced into laboratory populations of Escherichia coli5,6,7, and to the effects of intense selective events on mutator frequencies in E. coli8. Here we report the rise of spontaneously originated mutators in populations of E. coli undergoing long-term adaptation to a new environment. Our results corroborate computer simulations of mutator evolution in adapting clonal populations4, and may help to explain observations that associate high mutation rates with emerging pathogens9 and with certain cancers10.
As a means of studying evolution directly in the laboratory, 12 replicate experimental populations of a clonal strain of E. coli were established11. Because these populations were founded from a single ancestral clone, mutation provided their only source of genetic variation. The glucose-limited environment in which these populations were propagated was essentially novel at the outset of the experiment and it provided considerable scope for adaptive evolution. Substantial evolutionary increases in fitness and changes in certain other phenotypic features in these populations have been documented elsewhere11,12,13,14,15.
We measured mutation rates in the common ancestral strain and in the 12 experimental populations after they had been evolving for 10,000 generations. Most of the populations retained the ancestral mutation rate, but three populations (designated Ara−2, Ara−4 and Ara+3) displayed mutation rates that were between one and two orders of magnitude higher than those in the ancestor (Fig. 1). The times at which mutator phenotypes arose during the evolution of populations Ara−2, Ara−4 and Ara+3, as determined by screening for the mutator phenotype in isolates stored periodically throughout the experiment, are shown in Fig. 2. Once a lineage displayed a mutator phenotype, all subsequent isolates from that lineage also tested as mutators through 10,000 generations. This observation indicates that mutators rose to and remained at high frequencies in these populations.
To ascertain a genetic basis for the observed mutator phenotypes, we transformed 10,000-generation clonal isolates from populations Ara−2, Ara−4 and Ara+3, and an isolate from the ancestral strain REL606 with multicopy plasmids bearing wild-type alleles of seven known general mutator loci. The ancestral mutation rate was fully restored in the Ara−2, Ara−4 and Ara+3 strains only by the presence of wild-type alleles of genes in the methyl-directed mismatch repair pathway16 (Fig. 3). The mutation rate in the ancestral strain, REL606, was not significantly affected by the plasmids (with a single exception: see Fig. 3). In the Ara+3 strain the mutS+ allele alone restored the ancestral mutation rate. In the Ara−2 and Ara−4 strains the ancestral rate was restored completely by uvrD+, and the data also indicated a partial effect of mutL+. Recent studies have suggested that there is a mechanistic interaction between the mutL and uvrD gene products, such that a defect in one may in some cases be complemented by increased production of the other (P. Modrich, personal communication).
Most mutations are deleterious, so mutator alleles are likely on average to have negative effects on fitness. In an evolving clonal population, however, a deleterious mutator can rise to high frequency (hitch-hike) in association with an adaptive mutation, provided that the selective cost of the mutator does not outweigh the selective benefit of the adaptive mutation. Hitch-hiking of mutators with adaptive mutations was demonstrated previously in chemostat populations of E. coli6, but these results left open the question of whether such events would be likely to occur in natural populations. When a mutator was introduced above a relatively high threshold number relative to the wild type, the mutator population always acquired an adaptive mutation before the wild-type population, and the mutator rose to high frequency. However, when the mutator was introduced in lower numbers, the wild-type population always acquired a beneficial mutation first and displaced the mutator.
In the evolution experiment we have described here, as in natural populations, mutator alleles must have arisen by mutation. This raises the question of how mutators reached high frequencies in 3 of our 12 populations. Computer simulations4 and analytical modelling (P.J.G. and P.D.S., unpublished data) suggest that rare mutators may occasionally hitch-hike to high frequencies in finite asexual populations as a consequence of chance associations with adaptive mutations. We think that such chance hitch-hiking events are the likely explanation for our results. Sufficient time may not have elapsed for them to have been observed in earlier studies of competition between mutator and wild-type strains5,6,7, as those studies were carried out for only a few tens or hundreds of generations, as opposed to the 10,000 generations in our study. Although we cannot formally exclude the possibility that certain mutations in mismatch repair might increase fitness directly, it is much more likely that the evolved mutators we observed are deleterious or at best effectively neutral. Indeed, known mutator alleles of mutS, mutL and uvrD do not increase cell fitness under our experimental conditions (C. Zeyl, unpublished data).
A prediction of the simulations conducted by Taddei et al.4 is that mutators will hitch-hike in some, but not all, finite asexual populations undergoing adaptation. Our experimental observations are consistent with this prediction. A further prediction is that fitness will be higher on average in mutator populations than in those that retain the wild-type mutation rate. However, this fitness effect is very small and subtle: approximately half of the mutator populations in the simulations of Taddei et al. did not show higher fitness, and the observed increases in fitness over contemporaneous wild-type populations were slight (approximately 1%) in the remainder (see Fig. 3b in ref. 4). We tested for a relationship between mutability and fitness in our experimental populations in several ways, none of which gave statistical significance. For example, we tested for a correlation between mutability ranks (as calculated from data obtained in screens for mutator phenotypes; see Methods) and relative fitness ranks averaged across the duration of the experiment in all 12 populations. The results were inconclusive (r = 0.28, n = 12, one-tailed P = 0.19). It is clear from our experiments and the simulations of Taddei et al.4 that increased mutation rate and not increased fitness is the more striking consequence of the hitch-hiking process.
Our finding that asexual populations can evolve high mutation rates in a relatively benign environment may help to explain observations associating mismatch repair mutators with certain cancers10 and with pathogenicity in E. coli and Salmonella9. As in our experimental populations, high mutation rates may evolve as a chance byproduct of adaptation in clonal tumour lineages and in populations of asexual pathogens17,18. The potential for faster evolution once high mutation rates have evolved may have important health implications.
Experimental system. The common ancestral strain was REL606, an Ara− clone of E. coli B obtained by B. R. Levin from S. Lederberg19. A spontaneous Ara+ revertant was selected from REL606 and designated REL607. Six clones each from REL606 and REL607 were used to found the 12 experimental populations, which were propagated at 37 °C by daily 100-fold dilutions into 10 ml of fresh Davis minimal medium20 supplemented with glucose at 25 μg ml−1. Population sizes fluctuated between approximately 5× 106 cells after dilution and 5× 108 cells at the stationary phase. Isolates from each population were stored at −80 °C at 100-generation intervals during the first 2,500 generations of the experiment, and at 500-generation intervals thereafter.
Mutation rate measurements. Fluctuation tests21 to estimate a given rate of mutation were conducted simultaneously on all strains to provide a controlled comparison. Before testing, strains were revived and regrown for 3 days in the original experimental medium to re-establish the physiological conditions that had prevailed in the evolving populations. In general, 24 or more cultures of a given strain were grown from inocula of approximately 1,000 cells for each fluctuation test. For a given mutation rate measurement, all strains to be compared were grown separately in the same batch of Davis minimal medium. Cultures were grown to stationary phase before selective plating. (An additional 24 h in stationary phase had no discernible effect on the mutation rate in pilot studies.) Final population sizes were estimated by growing and sampling three extra cultures taken at random for each strain and measuring cell densities using a Coulter particle counter; the means were used in mutation rate calculations. Ara+ mutants were enumerated on Davis minimal agar medium supplemented with 4 mg ml−1 arabinose; Nalr mutants were enumerated on LB agar medium22 containing 20 μg ml−1 of nalidixic acid; T5r mutants were enumerated by plating cultures with excess phage T5 in soft agar.
Time of origin and persistence of mutator phenotypes. Mutator screens were conducted at approximately 500-generation intervals over the 10,000 generations of the experiment. Overnight cultures in 5 ml of Davis minimal medium (supplemented with 1,000 μg ml−1 glucose) were assayed for Nalr mutant numbers at the stationary phase. Expected distributions of mutants, based on mutator and ancestral mutation rates, were used to generate criteria by which isolates could be scored as mutator or non-mutator with >95% confidence.
Complementation tests. Strains were transformed with plasmids carrying wild-type alleles for mutH (plasmid pGW1899)23, mutL (pGW1842)23, mutS (pgW1811)23, uvrD (pGT26)24, mutT (pSK25)25, dnaQ (pMM5)26 and dnaE (pMK9)27, according to a standard protocol28. Fluctuation tests were conducted as described above, except that all strains were propagated in LB medium (containing 60 μg ml−1 of ampicillin where the strain was plasmid bearing), and five parallel cultures were used per fluctuation test.
Analysis of fluctuation test data. A local computer program using a Luria–Delbrück distribution-generating algorithm29 was used to calculate maximum-likelihood mutation rates from fluctuation test data. Approximate 95% confidence intervals for the mutation rates illustrated in Fig. 1 were calculated from formulae30. Approximate 95% confidence limits for the mutation rates illustrated in Fig. 3 are based on the theoretical variance of the maximum-likelihood estimate of ln (m), assuming normality, where m is the expected number of mutations per culture.
Drake, J. W. Spontaneous mutation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25, 125–146 (1991).
Leigh, E. G. Natural selection and mutability. Am. Nat. 104, 301–305 (1970).
Ishii, K., Matsuda, H., Iwasa, Y. & Sasaki, A. Evolutionarily stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genetics 121, 163–174 (1989).
Taddei, F.et al. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 387 700–702 (1997).
Cox, E. C. & Gibson, T. C. Selection for high mutation rates in chemostats. Genetics 77, 169–184 (1974).
Chao, L. & Cox, E. C. Competition between high and low mutating strains of Escherichia coli. Evolution 37, 125–134 (1983).
Tröbner, W. & Piechocki, R. Competition between isogenic mutS and mut+populations of Escherichia coli K12 in continuously growing cultures. Mol. Gen. Genet. 198, 175–176 (1984).
Mao, E. F., Lane, L., Lee, J. & Miller, J. H. Proliferation of mutators in a cell population. J. Bacteriol. 179, 417–422 (1997).
LeClerc, J. E., Li, B., Payne, W. L. & Cebula, T. High mutation frequencies among Escherichia coli and Salmonella pathogens. Science 274, 1208–1211 (1996).
Modrich, P. Mismatch repair, genetic stability and tumour avoidance. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347, 89–95 (1995).
Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315–1341 (1991).
Lenski, R. E. & Travisano, M. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: A 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6808–6814 (1994).
Vasi, F., Travisano, M. & Lenski, R. E. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. II. Changes in life-history traits during adaptation to a seasonal environment. Am. Nat. 144, 432–456 (1994).
Travisano, M. & Lenski, R. E. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IV. Targets of selection and the specificity of adaptation. Genetics 143, 15–26 (1996).
Elena, S. F., Cooper, V. S. & Lenski, R. E. Punctuated evolution caused by selection of rare beneficial mutations. Science 272, 1802–1804 (1996).
Modrich, P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25, 229–253 (1991).
Nowell, P. C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194, 23–28 (1974).
Moxon, E. R., Rainey, P. B., Nowak, M. A. & Lenski, R. E. Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria. Curr. Biol. 4, 24–33 (1994).
Lederberg, S. Genetics of host-controlled restriction and modification of deoxyribonucleic acid in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 91, 1029–1036 (1966).
Carlton, B. C. & Brown, B. J. in Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology (ed. Gerhardt, P.) 222–242 (American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1981).
Luria, S. E. & Delbrück, M. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28, 491–511 (1943).
Miller, J. H. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, 1992).
Pang, P. P., Lundberg, A. S. & Walker, G. C. Identification and characterization of the mutL and mutS gene products of Salmonella typhimurium LT2. J. Bacteriol. 163, 1007–1015 (1985).
Taucher-Scholz, G. & Hoffman-Berling, H. Identification of the gene for DNA helicase II of Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 137, 573–580 (1983).
Bhatnagar, S. K. & Bessman, M. J. Studies on the mutator gene, mutT, of Escherichia coli. Molecular cloning of the gene, purification of the gene product, and identification of a novel nucleoside triphosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 8953–8957 (1988).
Horiuchi, T., Maki, H., Maruyama, M. & Sekiguchi, M. Identification of the dnaQ gene product and location of the structural gene for RNAse H of Escherichia coli by cloning of the genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3770–3774 (1981).
Schaaper, R. M. & Cornacchio, R. An Escherichia coli dnaE mutation with suppressor activity toward mutator mutD5. J. Bacteriol. 174, 1974–1982 (1992).
Sambrook, E. F., Fritsch, T. & Maniatis, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, 1989).
Ma, W. T., Sandri, G. v. H. & Sarkar, S. Analysis of the Luria-Delbrück distribution using discrete convolution powers. J. Appl. Prob. 29, 255–267 (1992).
Stewart, F. M. Fluctuation tests: how reliable are the estimates of mutation rates? Genetics 137, 1139–1146 (1994).
We thank F. Taddei for sharing data before publicaiton; C. Zeyl for permission to cite unpublished data; A. White for help with statistical analyses; B. Bohannan, L. Ekunwe and P. Frank for technical assistance; T. Cebula, S. F. Elena, D. G. MacPhee, J. Mongold and M. Travisano for discussions; and H. Maki and J. E. LeClerc for plasmids. Supported by the US NSF and by the Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sniegowski, P., Gerrish, P. & Lenski, R. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387, 703–705 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/42701
This article is cited by
Adapted laboratory evolution of Thermotoga sp. strain RQ7 under carbon starvation
BMC Research Notes (2022)
A natural mutator allele shapes mutation spectrum variation in mice
Rapid evolution of mutation rate and spectrum in response to environmental and population-genetic challenges
Nature Communications (2022)
Scaffolding Natural Selection
Biological Theory (2022)
Two kinds of historical explanation in Evolutionary Biology
Biology & Philosophy (2022)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.