Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Critics slam treatment for SARS as ineffective and perhaps dangerous

Health authorities in Hong Kong are coming under intense criticism over their use of an antiviral drug combined with anti-inflammatory steroids to treat patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

Critics of the treatment say that there are few indications that the combination of steroids and the antiviral drug ribavirin is effective. And autopsies revealing damage to organs other than the lungs have raised the question of whether the drugs are partly to blame.

“There has been concern in Hong Kong about the efficacy of the treatment, and doctors there are calling for a re-examination of the protocol amid concerns that the prolonged use of high-dose ribavirin may be causing or exacerbating multi-organ failure,” says Gurinder Shahi, a physician and chairman of the Singapore-based biotechnology company BioEnterprise Asia.

Many in Hong Kong say that the necessary clinical tests have not been done, and that it is therefore too early to judge. “There is no clear evidence either way right now,” says Ka-fai To, a pathologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong whose autopsies of SARS victims found evidence of damage to the lymph nodes and spleen. “These findings could be side effects of the drug, but they could also be the effect of the virus or even an immune response to the virus,” she says.

In Hong Kong, which has the largest number of SARS cases and deaths outside mainland China, all patients receive the combination treatment, says John Tam, director of virology at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. The combination is also being used in China's Guangdong Province, Singapore and Toronto.

Although ribavirin is known to be toxic in some patients, it has been prescribed because of its effectiveness against respiratory syncytial virus. This virus is similar to the metapneumovirus that was first isolated in Hong Kong and was originally thought to be the cause of SARS, says Masato Tashiro of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Tokyo.

But the drug's efficacy against SARS, which is now thought to be caused by a new strain of coronavirus, is unknown. “Increasing numbers of patients show no improvement,” says Tam. In vitro tests are also negative, according to Tashiro.

But in the absence of any obvious alternative, health authorities in Hong Kong are sticking with the therapy. In a speech in Kuala Lumpur on 26 April, the health secretary Carrie Yau Tsang Ka-lai said that 80% of patients seem to respond favourably to the treatment.

But US officials have rejected ribavirin as a treatment for SARS. At a press briefing on 22 April, Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said: “There doesn't seem to be any activity of ribavirin against this particular coronavirus.”

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cyranoski, D. Critics slam treatment for SARS as ineffective and perhaps dangerous. Nature 423, 4 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/423004a

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing