Letter | Published:

The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism

Nature volume 388, pages 868871 (28 August 1997) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The fossil Kimberella quadrata was originally described from late Precambrian rocks of southern Australia1. Reconstructed as a jellyfish2, it was later assigned to the cubozoans (‘box jellies’), and has been cited as a clear instance of an extant animal lineage present before the Cambrian3,4,5,6,7. Until recently, Kimberella was known only from Australia, with the exception of some questionable north Indian specimens8. We now have over thirty-five specimens of this fossil from the Winter Coast of the White Sea in northern Russia. Our study of the new material does not support a cnidarian affinity. We reconstruct Kimberella as a bilaterally symmetrical, benthic animal with a non-mineralized, univalved shell, resembling a mollusc in many respects. This is important evidence for the existence of large triploblastic metazoans in the Precambrian and indicates that the origin of the higher groups of protostomes lies well back in the Precambrian.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The geology and Late Precambrian fauna of the Ediacara fossil reserve.Rec. S. Aust. Mus.13, 369–401 (1959).

  2. 2.

    & The Late Precambrian fossils from Ediacara, South Australia.Palaeontology9, 599–628 (1966).

  3. 3.

    Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa and other medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara fauna, South Australia.Palaeontology15, 197–225 (1972).

  4. 4.

    The Dawn of Animal Life(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1984)).

  5. 5.

    Interpreting the oldest fossil cnidarians.Palaeontograph. Am.54, 95–104 (1984).

  6. 6.

    in Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa(eds Lipps, J. H. & Signor, P. W.) 131–176 (Plenum, New York, (1992)).

  7. 7.

    The case for Ediacaran fossil roots to the metazoan tree.Mem. Geol. Sco. India20, 181–224 (1991).

  8. 8.

    & Precambrian–Cambrian sequence in Krol belt and additional Ediacaran fossils.Geophytology22, 27–39 (1992).

  9. 9.

    in The Vendian SystemVol. 1(eds Sokolov, B. S. & Iwanowski, A. B.) 3–70 (Springer, Heidelberg, (1990)).

  10. 10.

    Besskeletnaja fauna Venda i eë mesto v evoljutsii metazoa.Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta227, 1–174 (Nauka, Moscow, (1987)).

  11. 11.

    & Reconstructions of biotopes of ancient Metazoa of the Late Vendian White Sea biota.Paleontol. J.30, 674–678 (1996).

  12. 12.

    Preservation of soft-bodied animals in Precambrian sandstones at Ediacara, South Australia.Lethaia1, 238–267 (1968).

  13. 13.

    & The Emergence of Animals: the Cambrian Breakthrough(Columbia University Press, New York, (1989)).

  14. 14.

    & The Biology of Symbiosis(Arnold, London, (1987)).

  15. 15.

    & The Phylum Vendobionta: a sister group of the Eumetazoa?Paleobiology20, 1–4 (1994).

  16. 16.

    in The Mollusca 11: Form and Function(eds Trueman, E. R. & Clarke, M. R.) 253–286 (Academic, San Diego, (1989)).

  17. 17.

    & Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland.Nature345, 802–805 (1990).

  18. 18.

    & Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their role in early protostome evolution.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B347, 305–358 (1995).

  19. 19.

    in The Tunicata: with an Account of the British Species. Figs 105, 106, 107(Ray Society, London, (1950)).

  20. 20.

    Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution.J. Geol. Soc. Lond.149, 607–613 (1992).

  21. 21.

    Were Ediacaran Vendobionta multicellulars?N. Jb. Geol. Paläontol.190, 299–314 (1993).

  22. 22.

    Were the Ediacaran fossils lichens?Paleobiology20, 523–544 (1994).

  23. 23.

    Late Precambrian bilaterians: grades and clades.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA91, 6751–64757 (1994).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the volunteers and colleagues who collected much of this material, inparticular A. Yu. Ivantsov, D. V. Grazhdankin, J. Woland and A. G. Collins; Yu. I. Nikolaev, L.S.Zakharchenkova, the Paleontological Institute in Moscow, and the Arkhangel'skgeologiya office inArkhangel'sk, for field logistical support; R. van Syoc (California Academy of Sciences) for access to specimens of extant invertebrates; D. R. Lindberg and J. G. Gehling for helpful comments; A. Mazin for photography and Y. A. Afanasiev for artwork.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. *Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow117647, Russia

    • Mikhail A. Fedonkin
  2. †Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California94720, USA

Authors

  1. Search for Mikhail A. Fedonkin in:

  2. Search for Benjamin M. Waggoner in:

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mikhail A. Fedonkin or Benjamin M. Waggoner.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/42242

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.