The idea that earthquakes are 'time-predictable' underlies many of today's probabilistic forecasts. In a key test on California's San Andreas fault the concept is found wanting, but the news may not be all bad.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Earth, Planets and Space Open Access 24 June 2014
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Shimazaki, K. & Nakata, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 279–282 (1980).
Roeloffs, E. Curr. Sci. 79, 1226–1236 (2000).
Murray, J. & Segall, P. Nature 419, 287–291 (2002).
Toda, S. & Stein, R. S. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 10.1029/2001JB000172 (2002).
Fletcher, J. B. & Guatteri, M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 2295–2298 (1999).
Nadeau, R. M. & McEvilly, T. V. Science 285, 718–721 (1999).
Harris, R. A. & Archuleta, R. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 1215–1218 (1988).
Thurber, C. et al. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union Suppl. 81, S318 (2000); http://www.earthscope.org/safod.html
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, R. Parkfield's unfulfilled promise. Nature 419, 257–258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/419257a
This article is cited by
Journal of Seismology (2015)
Earth, Planets and Space (2004)