Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tropical agriculture

The value of bees to the coffee harvest


The self-pollinating African shrub Coffea arabica, a pillar of tropical agriculture, was considered to gain nothing from insect pollinators1,2. But I show here that naturalized, non-native honeybees can augment pollination and boost crop yields by over 50%. These findings, together with world coffee-harvest statistics and results from field studies of organically shade-grown coffee, indicate that coffee plants would benefit from being grown in habitats that are suitable for sustaining valuable pollinators.


African honeybees colonized western Panama in 1985, where they naturalized. By 1997 they had become major pollinators of coffee growing near forests at 1,500 m above sea level2. Yields of C. arabica may therefore be higher near forest, which provides a good pollinator habitat2. In a study of 50 2-year-old plants in Panama in 2001, I observed that flowers were visited not only by native pollinators, but also by the naturalized honeybees.

Ripe berries resulting from open pollination of coffee flowers were heavier than those on control branches that had been bagged with fine-mesh material (from which pollinators were excluded), and were more abundant per flower (49% increase; P < 0.01, paired t-test). The open-pollinated fruit was, on average, 7% heavier, whereas a 25% increase in mass was recorded when African honeybees had exclusively dominated the flowers2. This suggests that the contributions to final berry weight and total yield1,2 may differ for non-native honeybees and other, natural pollinators; however, bees consistently controlled over 36% of the total production.

Do bees control coffee harvests on a larger scale? Long-term data indicate that they do, although the results require detailed analysis. Almost 11 million hectares of coffee were harvested in 2001 (ref. 3). Cultivated areas of coffee in Ivory Coast, Ghana, Kenya, Cameroon and Indonesia have increased two- to fivefold in the past 41 years, although yields have decreased by 20–50%. El Salvador and Haiti, like other countries with intensive land usage and little natural habitat, show similar trends (Table 1)3. Pollinator loss is implicated in this decline, as sustained and aggressive cultivation may harm pollinators by removing their habitat.

Table 1 Worldwide coffee yields and potential contribution by African honeybees

A substantial increase in Latin American coffee yield partly coincided with the establishment of African honeybees in those countries2,4, although there was no such change in the Old World, where honeybees originated (Table 1). This comparison underlines a possible cause-and-effect relationship between the presence of social bees and coffee yield.

Further comparison of yields from the Caribbean islands with those from Mexico and Central America suggests that social bee colonies, which exploit blooming coffee intensely, have two important effects. Such colonies, whether native or introduced, are virtually absent on Caribbean islands. On the mainland, African honeybees may replace native pollinators (primarily stingless, social bees) without affecting yields (paired t-test)2,3,4 but they reduce the variation in yield, as indicated by the coefficient of variance (c.v., ratio of the standard deviation to the mean).

The c.v. magnitude for the islands had been the lowest in the region by a factor of two and has been stable for 41 years (P = 0.27, paired t-test). But after African bees arrived in Central America and Mexico, it dropped for those areas (P = 0.02, paired t-test), eventually reaching a value that is 23% less than for Caribbean islands. Moreover, the coffee yield of the islands has remained only half that of Central America and Mexico3, indicating an absence of pollination and outcrossing benefits from bees2. The low c.v. in yield in Haiti, for example (Table 1), may be derived from low variance in self-pollination and scarce pollinators.

Recent saturation of the neotropics with feral honeybees, which compete with other flower visitors4, has caused intensive exploitation of coffee and other flowering plants and has promoted pollination stability. However, although the island of New Guinea has no honeybees, its yields remain high (Table 1), partly because its native solitary bees pollinate the obligately outcrossing coffee plant Coffea canephora there1,3. C. canephora is grown in tropical lowlands and extensively in the Old World, but it is also wind-pollinated1.

Declining yields can be offset by expanded cultivation or by increasing planting density, but such remedies are unstable (Table 1). Although shade conditions significantly improve the flavour of commercial coffee5,6, coffee monocultures often lead to the removal of shade trees. The trend towards cultivating 'sun coffee' at high densities to boost yield5,6 will eliminate sites for bee nesting and mask the erosion of pollinator populations, which is shown here to affect yield by 36%. Optimization of coffee harvests and agricultural flexibility in tropical countries in the long term will depend on a consideration of pollinator sustainability and habitat.


  1. 1

    Free, J. B. Insect Pollination of Crops 2nd edn (Academic, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Roubik, D. W. Int. Workshop Conserv. Sust. Use Pollinators (eds Kevan, P. G. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.) (Int. Bee Res. Assoc., Cardiff, in the press).

  3. 3

    FAOSTAT online;

  4. 4

    Roubik, D. W. Science 201, 1030–1032 (1978).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Muschler, R. G. Agroforest. Syst. 51, 131–139 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Lyngbaek, A. E., Muschler, R. E. & Sinclair, F. L. Agroforest. Syst. 53, 205–213 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Roubik.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Additional information

brief communications is intended to provide a forum for both brief, topical reports of general scientific interest and technical discussion of recently published material of particular interest to non-specialist readers. Priority will be given to contributions that have fewer than 500 words, 10 references and only one figure. Detailed guidelines are available on Nature's website ( or on request from

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roubik, D. The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417, 708 (2002).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing